Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove submodules #423

Closed

Conversation

vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

@vrutkovs vrutkovs commented Sep 2, 2022

We no longer rebuild FCOS using cosa, so we no longer need fedora-coreos submodule.
From openshift-os submodule only gcp-routes is needed - it can be extracted from openshift-os (rhel-8-coreos in the payload).

@vrutkovs vrutkovs changed the title Remove submodules WIP Remove submodules Sep 2, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 2, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 2, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vrutkovs

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 2, 2022
@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member Author

vrutkovs commented Sep 3, 2022

/retest

@vrutkovs vrutkovs force-pushed the remove-fedora-coreos-submodule branch from 4854f2e to 4131205 Compare September 3, 2022 06:34
gcp-routes can be copied from openshift-os image
This is already provided by /usr/lib/NetworkManager/conf.d/20-client-id-from-mac.conf
@vrutkovs vrutkovs force-pushed the remove-fedora-coreos-submodule branch from 4131205 to a34a807 Compare September 3, 2022 06:45
@vrutkovs vrutkovs changed the title WIP Remove submodules Remove submodules Sep 3, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 3, 2022
@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member Author

vrutkovs commented Sep 3, 2022

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-upgrade

Previous build could not be installed

/test e2e-aws-ovn

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 3, 2022

@vrutkovs: Overrode contexts on behalf of vrutkovs: ci/prow/e2e-gcp-upgrade

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-upgrade

Previous build could not be installed

/test e2e-aws-ovn

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member Author

vrutkovs commented Sep 3, 2022

/retest

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
FROM registry.ci.openshift.org/origin/4.12:artifacts as artifacts
FROM registry.ci.openshift.org/origin/4.12:machine-config-operator as mcd
FROM registry.ci.openshift.org/origin/4.12:rhel-coreos-8 as rhcos
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we can't do this unfortunately if we want any kind of reproducibility out side of builds that have access to ocp - rhel-coreos-8 isn't going to be mirrored to origin going forward.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, snap, we might want to have src version of os then (present in the imagestream, but not included in the payload)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that would be nice indeed. I think for now, let's just remove the fcos config, and continue with the os submodule?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lets wait for openshift/release#31973 to merge and I'll update this PR.

@LorbusChris
Copy link
Member

@vrutkovs where does 20-client-id-from-mac.conf come from?

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member Author

vrutkovs commented Sep 3, 2022

Its part of FCOS now - https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/blob/testing-devel/overlay.d/05core/usr/lib/NetworkManager/conf.d/20-client-id-from-mac.conf

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 3, 2022

@vrutkovs: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 3, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@vrutkovs: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 4, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jan 3, 2023
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Feb 3, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 3, 2023

@openshift-bot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants