Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1894916: Panic output due to timeouts in openshift-apiserver #161

Conversation

p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@p0lyn0mial: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

WIP: fake bump(*)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 7, 2020
@p0lyn0mial p0lyn0mial changed the title WIP: fake bump(*) Bug: 1894916: Panic output due to timeouts in openshift-apiserver Dec 7, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@p0lyn0mial: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Bug: 1894916: Panic output due to timeouts in openshift-apiserver

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 7, 2020
@p0lyn0mial p0lyn0mial force-pushed the release-4.6-sar-tr-no-stack-on-panic branch from e14dcab to 3c83f6c Compare December 7, 2020 11:19
@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Dec 7, 2020

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Dec 7, 2020
@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

6 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@p0lyn0mial p0lyn0mial changed the title Bug: 1894916: Panic output due to timeouts in openshift-apiserver Bug 1894916: Panic output due to timeouts in openshift-apiserver Dec 9, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 9, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@p0lyn0mial: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1894916, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1885644 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1885644 targets the "4.7.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.7.0
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

Bug 1894916: Panic output due to timeouts in openshift-apiserver

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@xingxingxia
Copy link

/bugzilla cc-qa

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@xingxingxia: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1894916, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1885644 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1885644 targets the "4.7.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.7.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @xingxingxia

In response to this:

/bugzilla cc-qa

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@xingxingxia
Copy link

Pre-merge test passes in 1894916#c4, so adding QE lgtm:
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: p0lyn0mial, sttts, xingxingxia

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jwforres jwforres added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jan 27, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@soltysh
Copy link
Member

soltysh commented Jan 28, 2021

e2e-cmd is known to be flakey and it's currently awaiting openshift/origin#25831

/override ci/prow/e2e-cmd

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@soltysh: soltysh unauthorized: /override is restricted to Repo administrators, approvers in top level OWNERS file.

In response to this:

e2e-cmd is known to be flakey and it's currently awaiting openshift/origin#25831

/override ci/prow/e2e-cmd

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@mfojtik
Copy link
Member

mfojtik commented Jan 28, 2021

/override ci/prow/e2e-cmd

This is known broken and being fixed already in origin PR.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@mfojtik: Overrode contexts on behalf of mfojtik: ci/prow/e2e-cmd

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-cmd

This is known broken and being fixed already in origin PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit ee20d4a into openshift:release-4.6 Jan 28, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@p0lyn0mial: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1894916 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1894916: Panic output due to timeouts in openshift-apiserver

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants