Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to kubernetes-1.17.0 #63

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Dec 18, 2019

Conversation

mfojtik
Copy link
Member

@mfojtik mfojtik commented Dec 18, 2019

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Dec 18, 2019
github.com/openshift/apiserver-library-go v0.0.0-20191121105954-72a8df0fc9cc
github.com/openshift/client-go v0.0.0-20190923180330-3b6373338c9b
github.com/openshift/library-go v0.0.0-20190924092619-a8c1174d4ee7
github.com/openshift/api v3.9.1-0.20190923175213-ecbc01928def+incompatible
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@deads2k because go.mod is incredibly stupid, it picks the only existing tag in this repo (and wrong commit...) i think we need to remove that tag or start using tags properly in that repo...

For now, I need to use replace to pin it into HEAD of master branch.

@@ -39,7 +39,8 @@ var MissingValidationExceptions = []reflect.Type{

func TestCoverage(t *testing.T) {
for kind, apiType := range legacyscheme.Scheme.KnownTypes(legacy.InternalGroupVersion) {
if strings.HasPrefix(apiType.PkgPath(), "github.com/openshift/openshift-apiserver/vendor/") {
if strings.HasPrefix(apiType.PkgPath(), "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/apis") ||
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@deads2k @soltysh this is go 1.13 breakage unrelated to this PR...

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bparees or @adambkaplan I think you asked on slack the other day

Copy link
Member

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 18, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mfojtik, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

k8s.io/sample-cli-plugin => k8s.io/sample-cli-plugin v0.0.0-20191118183100-3aef6409ab31
k8s.io/sample-controller => k8s.io/sample-controller v0.0.0-20191118182133-e0ba6ec94108
k8s.io/api => k8s.io/api v0.17.0
k8s.io/apiextensions-apiserver => k8s.io/apiextensions-apiserver v0.17.0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

weird that these are pinned, but this is a leaf for now. We'll come back to fix.

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ CODEGEN_PKG=${CODEGEN_PKG:-$(cd ${SCRIPT_ROOT}; ls -d -1 ./vendor/k8s.io/code-ge

verify="${VERIFY:-}"

go install ./${CODEGEN_PKG}/cmd/deepcopy-gen
GOFLAGS="" go install ./${CODEGEN_PKG}/cmd/deepcopy-gen
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

? doesn't this need to be vendor mode?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not here, because how these tools are build. I was inclined to move towards binaries that we'll wget like we did with controller-gen

@mfojtik
Copy link
Member Author

mfojtik commented Dec 18, 2019

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws
/override ci/prow/e2e-cmd

e2e-aws flake hard on: openshift/origin#24320 (has BZ linked)
e2e-cmd is permanently broken on: openshift/origin#24319 (has BZ linked)

Both PR's are approved and waiting for merge, no need to wait for merging them here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@mfojtik: Overrode contexts on behalf of mfojtik: ci/prow/e2e-aws, ci/prow/e2e-cmd

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws
/override ci/prow/e2e-cmd

e2e-aws flake hard on: openshift/origin#24320 (has BZ linked)
e2e-cmd is permanently broken on: openshift/origin#24319 (has BZ linked)

Both PR's are approved and waiting for merge, no need to wait for merging them here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 859877b into openshift:master Dec 18, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@mfojtik: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-cmd 6fdb341 link /test e2e-cmd
ci/prow/e2e-aws 6fdb341 link /test e2e-aws

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants