Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1814207: fixes configmap "extension-apiserver-authentication" not found #87

Conversation

p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@p0lyn0mial: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Bump kubernetes apiserver

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @sttts

@p0lyn0mial p0lyn0mial changed the title Bump kubernetes apiserver Bug 1814207: fixes configmap "extension-apiserver-authentication" not found Apr 2, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@p0lyn0mial: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1814207, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.4.0" release, but it targets "4.4.z" instead
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1813964 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is NEW instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1814207: fixes configmap "extension-apiserver-authentication" not found

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 2, 2020
@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Apr 2, 2020

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 2, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: p0lyn0mial, sttts

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 2, 2020
@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@p0lyn0mial: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1814207, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1813964 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is NEW instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@stlaz
Copy link
Member

stlaz commented Apr 6, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 6, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@stlaz: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1814207, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.4.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.4.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1813964 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1813964 targets the "4.5.0" release, matching the expected (4.5.0) release
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@mfojtik mfojtik added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Apr 6, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c28dd30 into openshift:release-4.4 Apr 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants