New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert "STOR-1065: Rework sidecar bindings to bind common ClusterRoles" #118
Revert "STOR-1065: Rework sidecar bindings to bind common ClusterRoles" #118
Conversation
@dgoodwin: This pull request references STOR-1065 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dgoodwin The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
Based on feedback from @jsafrane we believe it's best to revert all changes related to this jira that went into the affected payloads. /override ci/prow/e2e-openstack |
@dgoodwin: Overrode contexts on behalf of dgoodwin: ci/prow/e2e-openstack, ci/prow/e2e-openstack-csi In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@dgoodwin: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
…ind common ClusterRoles" PR openshift#118 (openshift#118) reverted "STOR-1065: Rework sidecar bindings to bind common ClusterRoles" as the safest way back to a known good state after nigltly CI tests detected that storage operator is degraded on all gcp and azure installs upgrades. Openstack-cinder is immune to those issues. Let's bring "STOR-1065: Rework sidecar bindings to bind common ClusterRoles" back now.
…ind common ClusterRoles" PR openshift#118 (openshift#118) reverted "STOR-1065: Rework sidecar bindings to bind common ClusterRoles" as the safest way back to a known good state after nigltly CI tests detected that storage operator is degraded on all gcp and azure installs upgrades. Openstack-cinder is immune to those issues. Let's bring "STOR-1065: Rework sidecar bindings to bind common ClusterRoles" back now.
Reverts #117