Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test commit, please ignore #146

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

awgreene
Copy link
Contributor

@awgreene awgreene commented Aug 2, 2021

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 2, 2021

@awgreene: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

test commit, please ignore

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 2, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 2, 2021

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 2, 2021

@awgreene: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

test commit, please ignore

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 2, 2021
@timflannagan
Copy link
Contributor

/uncc

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the request for review from timflannagan August 2, 2021 21:17
@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor Author

awgreene commented Aug 2, 2021

/remove-approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 2, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please assign kevinrizza after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @kevinrizza in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 2, 2021
@awgreene awgreene marked this pull request as ready for review August 2, 2021 21:19
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 2, 2021
@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor Author

awgreene commented Aug 3, 2021

/retest

@anik120
Copy link
Contributor

anik120 commented Aug 3, 2021

Looks like the e2e-aws-olm tests did not have any issue with bringing up the catalog pods on the first run

waiting for catalog pod mock-ocs to be available (for sync) - CONNECTING
waiting for catalog pod mock-ocs to be available (for sync) - CONNECTING
waiting for catalog pod mock-ocs to be available (for sync) - CONNECTING
waiting for catalog pod mock-ocs to be available (for sync) - CONNECTING
catalog mock-ocs pod with address mock-ocs.openshift-operators.svc:50051
waiting for catalog pod mock-nginx-bpr5p to be available (after catalog update) - CONNECTING
waiting for catalog pod mock-nginx-bpr5p to be available (after catalog update) - CONNECTING
waiting for catalog pod mock-nginx-bpr5p to be available (after catalog update) - CONNECTING
waiting for catalog pod mock-nginx-bpr5p to be available (after catalog update) - CONNECTING
catalog updated
waiting for catalog pod mock-ocs-main-preexistingcrdownerisreplaced-k4kdv to be available (for sync) - TRANSIENT_FAILURE
waiting for catalog pod mock-ocs-main-preexistingcrdownerisreplaced-k4kdv to be available (for sync) - CONNECTING
waiting for catalog pod mock-ocs-main-preexistingcrdownerisreplaced-k4kdv to be available (for sync) - CONNECTING
waiting for catalog pod mock-ocs-main-preexistingcrdownerisreplaced-k4kdv to be available (for sync) - CONNECTING
catalog mock-ocs-main-preexistingcrdownerisreplaced-k4kdv pod with address mock-ocs-main-preexistingcrdownerisreplaced-k4kdv.openshift-operators.svc:50051

@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor Author

awgreene commented Aug 3, 2021

@anik120 I'll give it a few goes before closing the associated BZ.

@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor Author

awgreene commented Aug 3, 2021

Second run passed. Attempting a third run to see if issue in BZ can be reproduced.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 3, 2021

@awgreene: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/verify 5d3ed0a link /test verify
ci/prow/e2e-aws-console-olm 5d3ed0a link /test e2e-aws-console-olm

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor Author

awgreene commented Aug 4, 2021

Closing this PR which has indicated that the BZ is not reproducible.

@awgreene awgreene closed this Aug 4, 2021
ankitathomas added a commit to ankitathomas/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2021
…ft#146)

Signed-off-by: Ankita Thomas <ankithom@redhat.com>

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: 01ed866fe519bd71d8550b3f1a411f819325c422
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants