New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-29116: [release-4.15]: Clear (existing) error cond from Subscription, once error resolved #684
OCPBUGS-29116: [release-4.15]: Clear (existing) error cond from Subscription, once error resolved #684
Conversation
…3166) The func `removeSubsCond` takes in a list of pointers to Subscription objects, modifies the objects that the pointers point to, but return a new list of those pointers. A [PR](operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager#2942) included in the v0.25.0 release [changed the way the output of that function was being used](https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager/pull/2942/files#diff-a1760d9b7ac1e93734eea675d8d8938c96a50e995434b163c6f77c91bace9990R1146-R1155) leading to a regression. This PR fixes the `removeSubsCond` function, fixing the regression as a result. Closes #3162 Signed-off-by: Anik Bhattacharjee <anbhatta@redhat.com> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 54da66a9996632315827ba37e14823de6405b4d9
PR #3166 removes the `BundleUnpacking` condition once resolution is successful. PR #3166 [modified an e2e test](operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager@54da66a#diff-11f70fc71ac22d725767916f562789de88d06eb9ebe19f337a59fd7035a3ca2dR2448) to reflect that change. However, the test being fixed in this PR is skipped for upstream, and runs only downstream.This PR is a follow up to #3166 to reflect the `BundleUnpacking` condition removal in the remaining test. Signed-off-by: Anik Bhattacharjee <anbhatta@redhat.com> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 6e3f051a4d9ac32222a051029570b88c8ba9e4f6
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: anik120 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/jira cherrypick OCPBUGS-24587 |
@anik120: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-24587 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29116. Will retitle bug to link to clone. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@anik120: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29116, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/lgtm |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
@anik120: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest-required |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
@anik120: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29116, which is valid. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
4ffebf7
into
openshift:release-4.15
@anik120: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29116: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29116 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build operator-lifecycle-manager-container-v4.15.0-202402070737.p0.g4ffebf7.assembly.stream.el9 for distgit operator-lifecycle-manager. |
No description provided.