Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-31073: Synchronize From Upstream Repositories #737

Merged

Conversation

openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

The staging/ and vendor/ directories have been synchronized from the upstream repositories, pulling in the following commits:

Date Commit Author Message
2024-04-17 19:02:50 operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager@47aaa6b Kevin Rizza Fix unpack job cache issue (#3204)

This pull request is expected to merge without any human intervention. If tests are failing here, changes must land upstream to fix any issues so that future downstreaming efforts succeed.

/cc @openshift/openshift-team-operator-runtime
/cc @openshift/openshift-team-operator-ecosystem

In the same vein as
operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager#3202,
use update if the unpack job already exists but isn't cached

Signed-off-by: kevinrizza <krizza@redhat.com>
Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 47aaa6be4a951c6bd8be016f6610c5319adc6a47
@openshift-bot openshift-bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Apr 18, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Apr 18, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

In response to this:

The staging/ and vendor/ directories have been synchronized from the upstream repositories, pulling in the following commits:

Date Commit Author Message
2024-04-17 19:02:50 operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager@47aaa6b Kevin Rizza Fix unpack job cache issue (#3204)

This pull request is expected to merge without any human intervention. If tests are failing here, changes must land upstream to fix any issues so that future downstreaming efforts succeed.

/cc @openshift/openshift-team-operator-runtime
/cc @openshift/openshift-team-operator-ecosystem

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from a team April 18, 2024 00:02
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 18, 2024

@openshift-bot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: openshift/openshift-team-operator-ecosystem.

Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

The staging/ and vendor/ directories have been synchronized from the upstream repositories, pulling in the following commits:

Date Commit Author Message
2024-04-17 19:02:50 operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager@47aaa6b Kevin Rizza Fix unpack job cache issue (#3204)

This pull request is expected to merge without any human intervention. If tests are failing here, changes must land upstream to fix any issues so that future downstreaming efforts succeed.

/cc @openshift/openshift-team-operator-runtime
/cc @openshift/openshift-team-operator-ecosystem

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 18, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-bot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

1 similar comment
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 18, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-bot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kevinrizza kevinrizza changed the title NO-ISSUE: Synchronize From Upstream Repositories OCPBUGS-31073: Synchronize From Upstream Repositories Apr 18, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 18, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-31073, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

The staging/ and vendor/ directories have been synchronized from the upstream repositories, pulling in the following commits:

Date Commit Author Message
2024-04-17 19:02:50 operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager@47aaa6b Kevin Rizza Fix unpack job cache issue (#3204)

This pull request is expected to merge without any human intervention. If tests are failing here, changes must land upstream to fix any issues so that future downstreaming efforts succeed.

/cc @openshift/openshift-team-operator-runtime
/cc @openshift/openshift-team-operator-ecosystem

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@kevinrizza
Copy link
Member

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 18, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@kevinrizza: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-31073, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @kuiwang02

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 18, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from kuiwang02 April 18, 2024 00:16
@kuiwang02
Copy link

/hold

for pre-testing

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 18, 2024

@openshift-bot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@kuiwang02
Copy link

/unhold

pre-verify pass

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 18, 2024
@kuiwang02
Copy link

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Apr 18, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-31073, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @kuiwang02

In response to this:

The staging/ and vendor/ directories have been synchronized from the upstream repositories, pulling in the following commits:

Date Commit Author Message
2024-04-17 19:02:50 operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager@47aaa6b Kevin Rizza Fix unpack job cache issue (#3204)

This pull request is expected to merge without any human intervention. If tests are failing here, changes must land upstream to fix any issues so that future downstreaming efforts succeed.

/cc @openshift/openshift-team-operator-runtime
/cc @openshift/openshift-team-operator-ecosystem

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 773439e into openshift:master Apr 18, 2024
13 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-31073: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-31073 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

The staging/ and vendor/ directories have been synchronized from the upstream repositories, pulling in the following commits:

Date Commit Author Message
2024-04-17 19:02:50 operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager@47aaa6b Kevin Rizza Fix unpack job cache issue (#3204)

This pull request is expected to merge without any human intervention. If tests are failing here, changes must land upstream to fix any issues so that future downstreaming efforts succeed.

/cc @openshift/openshift-team-operator-runtime
/cc @openshift/openshift-team-operator-ecosystem

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@kevinrizza
Copy link
Member

/cherry-pick release-4.15

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@kevinrizza: new pull request created: #738

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build operator-lifecycle-manager-container-v4.16.0-202404181209.p0.g773439e.assembly.stream.el9 for distgit operator-lifecycle-manager.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants