Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bug 1752850: Seed index patterns based on match to existing indices #1755

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 19, 2019
Merged

Bug 1752850: Seed index patterns based on match to existing indices #1755

merged 1 commit into from Sep 19, 2019

Conversation

jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 17, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jcantrill: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1752850, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1746377 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1752850: Seed index patterns based on match to existing indices

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 17, 2019
@jcantrill jcantrill added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. release/4.1 and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 17, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 17, 2019
@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jcantrill: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1752850, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 18, 2019
@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 18, 2019 •
edited

@jcantrill: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws 05603ee link /test e2e-aws

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 18, 2019
richm
richm approved these changes Sep 18, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@richm richm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 18, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jcantrill, richm

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@bparees bparees added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Sep 19, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 81fab5c into openshift:release-4.1 Sep 19, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jcantrill: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1752850 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1752850: Seed index patterns based on match to existing indices

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@richm richm richm approved these changes

@bparees bparees Awaiting requested review from bparees

@nhosoi nhosoi Awaiting requested review from nhosoi

Assignees

@richm richm

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release/4.1 size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
5 participants
@jcantrill @openshift-ci-robot @richm @bparees @openshift-merge-robot