Improving display of <status-icon>s #1035
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rhamilto
changed the title
spadgett
approved these changes
Dec 14, 2016
|
[merge] |
|
Evaluated for origin web console merge up to 33af1dc |
|
Origin Web Console Merge Results: SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_requests_origin_web_console/856/) (Base Commit: cfc61cd) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #1023, improving spacing and alignment issues with the status-icons directive.
Note: status-icons always get a fixed width now so they're consistent everywhere given the nature of the directive to change the icon based upon a dynamically changing status. As a result, I removed the fixedWidth option from the directive.
Before:
After:
@jwforres or @spadgett, PTAL