allow for bypass of not proceeding deployment check jenkins extended tests given update center sync delay is now on startup #19008

gabemontero · 2018-03-16T19:08:28Z

@openshift/sig-developer-experience ptal

see discussion in openshift/jenkins#544 and failure in https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_branch_origin_extended_image_ecosystem/417/consoleFull#-153881154656cbb9a5e4b02b88ae8c2f77

bparees · 2018-03-16T19:16:53Z

hm. this is going to make these tests always wait 3 minutes before they have any hope of progressing.

should we be changing the waitfordeploymentconfig logic? is it just flat out wrong that it currently aborts when progressing is false, based on your deployment api investigation?

I think this is worth a discussion with @mfojtik and team.

bparees · 2018-03-16T19:24:26Z

i'm going to lgtm this for now to unbreak the tests but i still want to followup on changing the waitfordeploymentconfig logic so our jenkins tests don't have to do this mandatory 3 minute delay.

/lgtm

/hold
(for passing tests)

gabemontero · 2018-03-16T20:02:25Z

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Ben Parees ***@***.***> wrote: hm. this is going to make these tests always wait 3 minutes before they have any hope of progressing. should we be changing the waitfordeploymentconfig logic? is it just flat out wrong that it currently aborts when progressing is false, based on your deployment api investigation?

I debated with myself more invasive changes and then opted for this. In my testing at least, jenkins startup now is at least 2 to 3 minutes anyway doing the update center stuff on startup. So I used that in my decision making process.

I think this is worth a discussion with @mfojtik <https://github.com/mfojtik> and team.

Sure thing

…

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#19008 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADbadHO1Zf8LvxSDfSK4WdluP0ISc-27ks5tfA-xgaJpZM4SuTIY> .

gabemontero · 2018-03-16T21:19:18Z

Well we got not progressing errors even with this change:

[image_ecosystem][jenkins][Slow] openshift pipeline plugin jenkins-plugin test context jenkins-plugin test multitag DSL [Suite:openshift] 12m25s

go run hack/e2e.go -v -test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=\[image\_ecosystem\]\[jenkins\]\[Slow\]\sopenshift\spipeline\splugin\s\sjenkins\-plugin\stest\scontext\s\s\sjenkins\-plugin\stest\smultitag\sDSL\s\[Suite\:openshift\]$'

/tmp/openshift/build-rpms/rpm/BUILD/origin-3.10.0/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/image_ecosystem/jenkins_plugin.go:154
Expected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc420b58590>: {s: "not progressing"}
    not progressing
not to have occurred
/tmp/openshift/build-rpms/rpm/BUILD/origin-3.10.0/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/image_ecosystem/jenkins_plugin.go:206
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom focus_parallel_03.xml

Filter through log files
[image_ecosystem][jenkins][Slow] openshift pipeline plugin jenkins-plugin test context jenkins-plugin test trigger build with slave [Suite:openshift] 12m23s

go run hack/e2e.go -v -test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=\[image\_ecosystem\]\[jenkins\]\[Slow\]\sopenshift\spipeline\splugin\s\sjenkins\-plugin\stest\scontext\s\s\sjenkins\-plugin\stest\strigger\sbuild\swith\sslave\s\[Suite\:openshift\]$'

/tmp/openshift/build-rpms/rpm/BUILD/origin-3.10.0/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/image_ecosystem/jenkins_plugin.go:154
Expected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc4201b85d0>: {s: "not progressing"}
    not progressing
not to have occurred
/tmp/openshift/build-rpms/rpm/BUILD/origin-3.10.0/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/image_ecosystem/jenkins_plugin.go:206
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom focus_parallel_02.xml

Filter through log files

Will get more aggressive in allowing for adjustments of existing logic

gabemontero · 2018-03-16T21:41:37Z

new version pushed that allows for not proceeding check to be optional

bparees · 2018-03-16T23:05:55Z

/lgtm

gabemontero · 2018-03-17T02:57:47Z

The bump of the jenkins LTS seems to have caused another problem (at least that is the most likely explanation for this exception, since we have not changed the login plugin lately):

java.io.IOException: java.lang.RuntimeException: Failed to serialize jenkins.model.Jenkins#securityRealm for class hudson.model.Hudson
	at hudson.XmlFile.write(XmlFile.java:200)
	at jenkins.model.Jenkins.save(Jenkins.java:3168)
	at jenkins.model.Jenkins.saveQuietly(Jenkins.java:3174)
	at jenkins.model.Jenkins.setAuthorizationStrategy(Jenkins.java:2544)
	at org.openshift.jenkins.plugins.openshiftlogin.OpenShiftOAuth2SecurityRealm.updateAuthorizationStrategy(OpenShiftOAuth2SecurityRealm.java:859)
	at org.openshift.jenkins.plugins.openshiftlogin.OpenShiftPermissionFilter.doFilter(OpenShiftPermissionFilter.java:210)
	at hudson.util.PluginServletFilter$1.doFilter(PluginServletFilter.java:151)
	at org.jenkinsci.plugins.ssegateway.Endpoint$SSEListenChannelFilter.doFilter(Endpoint.java:225)
	at hudson.util.PluginServletFilter$1.doFilter(PluginServletFilter.java:151)
	at io.jenkins.blueocean.ResourceCacheControl.doFilter(ResourceCacheControl.java:134)
	at hudson.util.PluginServletFilter$1.doFilter(PluginServletFilter.java:151)
	at io.jenkins.blueocean.auth.jwt.impl.JwtAuthenticationFilter.doFilter(JwtAuthenticationFilter.java:61)
	at hudson.util.PluginServletFilter$1.doFilter(PluginServletFilter.java:151)
	at hudson.util.PluginServletFilter.doFilter(PluginServletFilter.java:157)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1637)
	at hudson.security.csrf.CrumbFilter.doFilter(CrumbFilter.java:64)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1637)
	at hudson.security.ChainedServletFilter$1.doFilter(ChainedServletFilter.java:84)
	at hudson.security.UnwrapSecurityExceptionFilter.doFilter(UnwrapSecurityExceptionFilter.java:51)
	at hudson.security.ChainedServletFilter$1.doFilter(ChainedServletFilter.java:87)
	at jenkins.security.ExceptionTranslationFilter.doFilter(ExceptionTranslationFilter.java:117)
	at hudson.security.ChainedServletFilter$1.doFilter(ChainedServletFilter.java:87)
	at org.acegisecurity.providers.anonymous.AnonymousProcessingFilter.doFilter(AnonymousProcessingFilter.java:125)
	at hudson.security.ChainedServletFilter$1.doFilter(ChainedServletFilter.java:87)
	at org.acegisecurity.ui.rememberme.RememberMeProcessingFilter.doFilter(RememberMeProcessingFilter.java:135)
	at hudson.security.ChainedServletFilter$1.doFilter(ChainedServletFilter.java:87)
	at org.acegisecurity.ui.AbstractProcessingFilter.doFilter(AbstractProcessingFilter.java:271)
	at hudson.security.ChainedServletFilter$1.doFilter(ChainedServletFilter.java:87)
	at jenkins.security.BasicHeaderProcessor.doFilter(BasicHeaderProcessor.java:93)
	at hudson.security.ChainedServletFilter$1.doFilter(ChainedServletFilter.java:87)
	at org.acegisecurity.context.HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter.doFilter(HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter.java:249)
	at hudson.security.HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter2.doFilter(HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter2.java:67)
	at hudson.security.ChainedServletFilter$1.doFilter(ChainedServletFilter.java:87)
	at hudson.security.ChainedServletFilter.doFilter(ChainedServletFilter.java:90)
	at hudson.security.HudsonFilter.doFilter(HudsonFilter.java:171)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1637)
	at org.kohsuke.stapler.compression.CompressionFilter.doFilter(CompressionFilter.java:49)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1637)
	at hudson.util.CharacterEncodingFilter.doFilter(CharacterEncodingFilter.java:82)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1637)
	at org.kohsuke.stapler.DiagnosticThreadNameFilter.doFilter(DiagnosticThreadNameFilter.java:30)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1637)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:533)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:143)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:524)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:132)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.nextHandle(ScopedHandler.java:190)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:1595)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.nextHandle(ScopedHandler.java:188)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1253)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.nextScope(ScopedHandler.java:168)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:473)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doScope(SessionHandler.java:1564)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.nextScope(ScopedHandler.java:166)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1155)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:141)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:132)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:564)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpChannel.handle(HttpChannel.java:317)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpConnection.onFillable(HttpConnection.java:251)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.io.AbstractConnection$ReadCallback.succeeded(AbstractConnection.java:279)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.io.FillInterest.fillable(FillInterest.java:110)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.io.ChannelEndPoint$2.run(ChannelEndPoint.java:124)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.Invocable.invokePreferred(Invocable.java:128)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.Invocable$InvocableExecutor.invoke(Invocable.java:222)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.EatWhatYouKill.doProduce(EatWhatYouKill.java:294)
	at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.EatWhatYouKill.run(EatWhatYouKill.java:199)
	at winstone.BoundedExecutorService$1.run(BoundedExecutorService.java:77)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Failed to serialize jenkins.model.Jenkins#securityRealm for class hudson.model.Hudson
	at hudson.util.RobustReflectionConverter$2.writeField(RobustReflectionConverter.java:256)
	at hudson.util.RobustReflectionConverter$2.visit(RobustReflectionConverter.java:224)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.reflection.PureJavaReflectionProvider.visitSerializableFields(PureJavaReflectionProvider.java:138)
	at hudson.util.RobustReflectionConverter.doMarshal(RobustReflectionConverter.java:209)
	at hudson.util.RobustReflectionConverter.marshal(RobustReflectionConverter.java:150)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.AbstractReferenceMarshaller.convert(AbstractReferenceMarshaller.java:69)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.TreeMarshaller.convertAnother(TreeMarshaller.java:58)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.TreeMarshaller.convertAnother(TreeMarshaller.java:43)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.TreeMarshaller.start(TreeMarshaller.java:82)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.AbstractTreeMarshallingStrategy.marshal(AbstractTreeMarshallingStrategy.java:37)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.XStream.marshal(XStream.java:1026)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.XStream.marshal(XStream.java:1015)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.XStream.toXML(XStream.java:988)
	at hudson.XmlFile.write(XmlFile.java:193)
	... 70 more
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Failed to serialize org.openshift.jenkins.plugins.openshiftlogin.OpenShiftOAuth2SecurityRealm#transport for class org.openshift.jenkins.plugins.openshiftlogin.OpenShiftOAuth2SecurityRealm
	at hudson.util.RobustReflectionConverter$2.writeField(RobustReflectionConverter.java:256)
	at hudson.util.RobustReflectionConverter$2.visit(RobustReflectionConverter.java:224)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.reflection.PureJavaReflectionProvider.visitSerializableFields(PureJavaReflectionProvider.java:138)
	at hudson.util.RobustReflectionConverter.doMarshal(RobustReflectionConverter.java:209)
	at hudson.util.RobustReflectionConverter.marshal(RobustReflectionConverter.java:150)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.AbstractReferenceMarshaller.convert(AbstractReferenceMarshaller.java:69)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.TreeMarshaller.convertAnother(TreeMarshaller.java:58)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.AbstractReferenceMarshaller$1.convertAnother(AbstractReferenceMarshaller.java:84)
	at hudson.util.RobustReflectionConverter.marshallField(RobustReflectionConverter.java:265)
	at hudson.util.RobustReflectionConverter$2.writeField(RobustReflectionConverter.java:252)
	... 83 more
Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Refusing to marshal com.google.api.client.http.javanet.NetHttpTransport for security reasons; see https://jenkins.io/redirect/class-filter/
	at hudson.util.XStream2$BlacklistedTypesConverter.marshal(XStream2.java:543)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.AbstractReferenceMarshaller.convert(AbstractReferenceMarshaller.java:69)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.TreeMarshaller.convertAnother(TreeMarshaller.java:58)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.AbstractReferenceMarshaller$1.convertAnother(AbstractReferenceMarshaller.java:84)
	at hudson.util.RobustReflectionConverter.marshallField(RobustReflectionConverter.java:265)
	at hudson.util.RobustReflectionConverter$2.writeField(RobustReflectionConverter.java:252)
	... 92 more

Don't know yet why this did not show up in the image tests or my manual starting of the image at 2.101.

Will study a little be more, and there may be a change in the login plugin to avoid this, but the quick fix is probably to revert the lts bump, then try to sort this out.

gabemontero · 2018-03-17T02:59:24Z

Marking this field transient might be the longer term solution:

Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Failed to serialize org.openshift.jenkins.plugins.openshiftlogin.OpenShiftOAuth2SecurityRealm#transport for class org.openshift.jenkins.plugins.openshiftlogin.OpenShiftOAuth2SecurityRealm

gabemontero · 2018-03-17T03:04:37Z

Duh ... bringing up the image outside a pod means the login plugin does not insert itself as the sec realm

gabemontero · 2018-03-17T04:29:14Z

ok let's retest after https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/view/All/job/push_jenkins_images/169/ completes

gabemontero · 2018-03-17T05:51:41Z

/retest

…tests given update center sync delay is now on startup

gabemontero · 2018-03-17T12:45:11Z

last run looked better (no exceptions saving the oauth sec realm where we are back to 2.89.4 for now)

the image_eco/jenkins-plugin.go runs still seem more prone to the deploy to's ... but they still run at 512Mi vs. our build/pipeline.go runs. Bumped image_eco/jenkins-plugin.go to more mem, and added pod log dump on jenkins deploy failure

In parallel, i'm testing locally:
a) i believe i have a login plugin change that will allow moving back to jenkins v2.107
b) but i'm still seeing some deploy timeouts in my local runs - seems more constrained than the ci/aws runs... going to look into, besides running with PARALLEL_NODES=1 on my laptop
i) moving the image's groovy init onto a separate thread ... perhaps that allows jenkins startup to proceed faster
ii) if that doesn't do it, figure our right deployment setting, modify jenkins template some more to allow more deploy time / reach out to master team as needed
iii) or give up once again on incurring the updater center churn on startup vs. first login

gabemontero · 2018-03-17T16:29:00Z

OK, look better wrt the update center / GC stuff.

The image eco failure was in a jenkins test, but the problem was unrelated to the JVM. There was a timeout adding the edit role to the service account:

/tmp/openshift/build-rpms/rpm/BUILD/origin-3.10.0/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/image_ecosystem/jenkins_plugin.go:154
Expected error:
    <*util.ExitError | 0xc42195e150>: {
        Cmd: "oc policy --config=/tmp/extended-test-jenkins-plugin-t9f42-lnzpd-user.kubeconfig --namespace=extended-test-jenkins-plugin-t9f42-lnzpd add-role-to-user edit system:serviceaccount:extended-test-jenkins-plugin-t9f42-lnzpd-jenkins:jenkins",
        StdErr: "Error from server: timeout",
        ExitError: {
            ProcessState: {
                pid: 109903,
                status: 256,
                rusage: {
                    Utime: {Sec: 0, Usec: 310356},
                    Stime: {Sec: 0, Usec: 60405},
                    Maxrss: 62672,
                    Ixrss: 0,
                    Idrss: 0,
                    Isrss: 0,
                    Minflt: 14998,
                    Majflt: 0,
                    Nswap: 0,
                    Inblock: 0,
                    Oublock: 0,
                    Msgsnd: 0,
                    Msgrcv: 0,
                    Nsignals: 0,
                    Nvcsw: 985,
                    Nivcsw: 1012,
                },
            },
            Stderr: nil,
        },
    }
    exit status 1
not to have occurred
/tmp/openshift/build-rpms/rpm/BUILD/origin-3.10.0/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/image_ecosystem/jenkins_plugin.go:246

gabemontero · 2018-03-17T16:32:52Z

the extended builds were 2 more instances of the service not being considered ready in 600 seconds

going to get another sample while I try the other alternatives noted in #19008 (comment)

gabemontero · 2018-03-17T16:33:01Z

/retest

gabemontero · 2018-03-19T20:14:12Z

ok, we actually got clean build/image_eco system runs this time, even without the upcoming jenkins image changes

given the latest build/image_ecosystem overnight runs both had a couple of intermittent not progressing errors, shall we merge this in the interim @bparees ?

I removed the debug stuff already

bparees · 2018-03-19T20:21:17Z

/hold cancel
/lgtm

openshift-ci-robot · 2018-03-19T20:21:24Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bparees, gabemontero

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~test/extended/OWNERS~~ [bparees]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-bot · 2018-03-19T21:29:51Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2018-03-19T23:29:50Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2018-03-20T01:29:51Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2018-03-20T03:29:51Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2018-03-20T05:29:50Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2018-03-20T09:29:52Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2018-03-20T11:29:51Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2018-03-20T13:29:45Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

gabemontero · 2018-03-20T13:42:25Z

fyi, none of the last few failures have been with the jenkins tests

gabemontero · 2018-03-20T13:44:40Z

the last conformance install failure was flake #17883

UPDATE - same test, but different problem from the above flake. The cause was different:

/tmp/openshift/build-rpms/rpm/BUILD/origin-3.10.0/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/builds/s2i_root.go:28
Expected error:
    <*util.ExitError | 0xc42061db30>: {
        Cmd: "oc new-build --config=/tmp/extended-test-s2i-build-root-gb8n9-tmw7m-user.kubeconfig --namespace=extended-test-s2i-build-root-gb8n9-tmw7m -D FROM centos/nodejs-6-centos7\nUSER 0 --name nodejsroot",
        StdErr: "error: can't lookup images: Timeout: request did not complete within allowed duration\nerror: unable to locate any images in image streams, local docker images with name \"centos/nodejs-6-centos7\"\n\nThe 'oc new-build' command will match arguments to the following types:\n\n  1. Images tagged into image streams in the current project or the 'openshift' project\n     - if you don't specify a tag, we'll add ':latest'\n  2. Images in the Docker Hub, on remote registries, or on the local Docker engine\n  3. Git repository URLs or local paths that point to Git repositories\n\n--allow-missing-images can be used to force the use of an image that was not matched\n\nSee 'oc new-build -h' for examples.",
        ExitError: {
            ProcessState: {
                pid: 98557,
                status: 256,
                rusage: {
                    Utime: {Sec: 0, Usec: 265538},
                    Stime: {Sec: 0, Usec: 44610},
                    Maxrss: 71380,
                    Ixrss: 0,
                    Idrss: 0,
                    Isrss: 0,
                    Minflt: 15038,
                    Majflt: 0,
                    Nswap: 0,
                    Inblock: 0,
                    Oublock: 0,
                    Msgsnd: 0,
                    Msgrcv: 0,
                    Nsignals: 0,
                    Nvcsw: 1869,
                    Nivcsw: 304,
                },
            },
            Stderr: nil,
        },
    }
    exit status 1
not to have occurred
/tmp/openshift/build-rpms/rpm/BUILD/origin-3.10.0/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/builds/s2i_root.go:35

@bparees @legionus @dmage - should i open a new issue to track this?

openshift-bot · 2018-03-20T15:29:55Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

gabemontero · 2018-03-20T17:10:05Z

various Stage PROVISION CLOUD RESOURCES [00h 10m 24s] failed. failures

/retest

gabemontero · 2018-03-20T17:15:55Z

more provision cloud failures ... will wait a bit, see if clouds heal

openshift-bot · 2018-03-20T17:29:55Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2018-03-21T07:29:52Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

gabemontero · 2018-03-21T14:24:48Z

provision test cluster problem

/test gcp

openshift-bot · 2018-03-21T15:29:54Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

gabemontero · 2018-03-21T17:26:35Z

ok tests pass again ... let's see if we get lucky and they do so again now that we are back on the merge queue

openshift-merge-robot · 2018-03-21T17:49:35Z

/test all [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

openshift-merge-robot · 2018-03-21T18:11:51Z

Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 19008, 18727, 19038).

openshift-ci-robot added the sig/developer-experience label Mar 16, 2018

openshift-ci-robot requested review from bparees and 0xmichalis March 16, 2018 19:08

openshift-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 16, 2018

gabemontero assigned bparees Mar 16, 2018

openshift-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Mar 16, 2018

gabemontero force-pushed the relax-jenkins-deploy-verify branch from 71eca12 to ca17cf5 Compare March 16, 2018 21:40

openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 16, 2018

gabemontero changed the title ~~relax deployment wait for jenkins extended tests given update center …~~ allow for bypass of not proceeding deployment check jenkins extended tests given update center sync delay is now on startup Mar 16, 2018

openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 16, 2018

allow for bypass of not proceeding deployment check jenkins extended …

e08918a

…tests given update center sync delay is now on startup

gabemontero force-pushed the relax-jenkins-deploy-verify branch from ca17cf5 to e08918a Compare March 17, 2018 12:38

openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 17, 2018

openshift-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 19, 2018

gabemontero mentioned this pull request Mar 19, 2018

allow for the disabling of memory intensive admin monitors via env va… openshift/jenkins#551

Merged

openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Mar 19, 2018

gabemontero mentioned this pull request Mar 20, 2018

go back to v2.107; bump login plugin to v1.0.7 to tolerate v2.107 openshift/jenkins#548

Merged

openshift-merge-robot merged commit eda7e84 into openshift:master Mar 21, 2018

gabemontero deleted the relax-jenkins-deploy-verify branch March 21, 2018 18:35

allow for bypass of not proceeding deployment check jenkins extended tests given update center sync delay is now on startup #19008

allow for bypass of not proceeding deployment check jenkins extended tests given update center sync delay is now on startup #19008

Conversation

gabemontero commented Mar 16, 2018 • edited

bparees commented Mar 16, 2018

bparees commented Mar 16, 2018

gabemontero commented Mar 16, 2018 via email

gabemontero commented Mar 16, 2018

gabemontero commented Mar 16, 2018

bparees commented Mar 16, 2018

gabemontero commented Mar 17, 2018

gabemontero commented Mar 17, 2018

gabemontero commented Mar 17, 2018

gabemontero commented Mar 17, 2018

gabemontero commented Mar 17, 2018

gabemontero commented Mar 17, 2018 • edited

gabemontero commented Mar 17, 2018

gabemontero commented Mar 17, 2018

gabemontero commented Mar 17, 2018

gabemontero commented Mar 19, 2018

bparees commented Mar 19, 2018

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 19, 2018

openshift-bot commented Mar 19, 2018

openshift-bot commented Mar 19, 2018

openshift-bot commented Mar 20, 2018

openshift-bot commented Mar 20, 2018

openshift-bot commented Mar 20, 2018

openshift-bot commented Mar 20, 2018

openshift-bot commented Mar 20, 2018

openshift-bot commented Mar 20, 2018

gabemontero commented Mar 20, 2018

gabemontero commented Mar 20, 2018 • edited

openshift-bot commented Mar 20, 2018

gabemontero commented Mar 20, 2018

gabemontero commented Mar 20, 2018

openshift-bot commented Mar 20, 2018

openshift-bot commented Mar 21, 2018

gabemontero commented Mar 21, 2018

openshift-bot commented Mar 21, 2018

gabemontero commented Mar 21, 2018

openshift-merge-robot commented Mar 21, 2018

openshift-merge-robot commented Mar 21, 2018

gabemontero commented Mar 16, 2018 •

edited

gabemontero commented Mar 17, 2018 •

edited

gabemontero commented Mar 20, 2018 •

edited