New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1734009: Unidling: minimize iptables lock contention #23426
Bug 1734009: Unidling: minimize iptables lock contention #23426
Conversation
@squeed: This pull request references a valid Bugzilla bug. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@dcbw PTAL, thanks! |
Uh, unit test failures have nothing to do with this. Is origin broken? |
/hold |
Yup. I just picked up 3.11 first, since there already was the backport and the sdn repo was being migrated as I started work. |
@squeed are you sure you want the |
@squeed could also squash these two together: UPSTREAM: 71735: proxy/userspace: respect minSyncInterval |
vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/proxy/iptables/proxier_openshift.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
otherwise looks good to me |
Proxies should be able to cleanly figure out when endpoints have been synced, so make all ProxyProviders also implement EndpointsHandler and pass those through to loadbalancers when required.
@squeed: This pull request references an invalid Bugzilla bug:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This backports openshift/sdn#8 Both proxies have an asynchronous apply loop, but we really need them to apply sequentially. So, run them as part of the same runner.
Are we good to merge this so we can get it in August 12th 3.11.z? |
/bugzilla refresh |
@squeed: This pull request references a valid Bugzilla bug. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/hold cancel |
/approve |
} | ||
|
||
func (proxy *OsdnProxy) OnServiceAdd(service *kapi.Service) { | ||
glog.V(2).Infof("sdn proxy: add svc %s/%s: %v", service.Namespace, service.Name, service) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@squeed I guess this is a leftover from my original patches.
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bparees, dcbw, squeed The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@squeed: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1734009 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This PR includes
Fixes: BZ 1699341