Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1776226: KubeAPI server doesn't accept large patch requests #24196

Conversation

p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@p0lyn0mial: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1776226, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Bug 1776226: KubeAPI server doesn't accept large patch requests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 25, 2019
@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @mfojtik

@@ -109,12 +125,12 @@ func TestMaxResourceSize(t *testing.T) {
t.Errorf("expected success or bad request err, got %v", err)
}
})
t.Run("ApplyPatchType should handle a patch just under the max limit", func(t *testing.T) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

almost a clean pick, I had to remove tests for ApplyPatchType because they don't apply here

@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@mfojtik
Copy link
Member

mfojtik commented Nov 25, 2019

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 25, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mfojtik, p0lyn0mial

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 25, 2019
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

4 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

I need to investigate the failing integration step.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 25, 2019
@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 27, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0731b2f into openshift:release-3.11 Nov 27, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@p0lyn0mial: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1776226 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1776226: KubeAPI server doesn't accept large patch requests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants