Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bug 1711607: Run CSI hostpath containers privileged during tests #24281

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jan 12, 2020
Merged

Bug 1711607: Run CSI hostpath containers privileged during tests #24281

merged 3 commits into from Jan 12, 2020

Conversation

jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor

@jsafrane jsafrane commented Dec 10, 2019 •
edited

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jsafrane: An error was encountered adding this pull request to the external tracker bugs for bug 1711607 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

JSONRPC error 100500: Insecure dependency in parameter 3 of DBI::db=HASH(0x5620fa42d5e0)->do method call while running with -T switch at /loader/0x5620f51258a8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 327.
at /loader/0x5620f51258a8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 327.
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug::update_ext_info('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug=HASH(0x5620f9cd70a8)', 1) called at /loader/0x5620f51258a8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 121
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug::create('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug', 'HASH(0x5620f99005a8)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/extensions/ExternalBugs/Extension.pm line 858
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::bug_start_of_update('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs=HASH(0x5620f9885990)', 'HASH(0x5620fa2b84b8)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Hook.pm line 21
Bugzilla::Hook::process('bug_start_of_update', 'HASH(0x5620fa2b84b8)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm line 1170
Bugzilla::Bug::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x5620fa45ce88)') called at /loader/0x5620f51258a8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/WebService.pm line 80
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::WebService::add_external_bug('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x5620f9f045d8)') called at (eval 2497) line 1
eval ' $procedure->{code}->($self, @params)
;' called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 220
JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x5620f9da4220)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 295
Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x5620f9da4220)') called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 126
JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 70
Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/jsonrpc.cgi line 31
ModPerl::ROOT::Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::var_www_html_bugzilla_jsonrpc_2ecgi::handler('Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x5620f9dd1f08)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207
eval {...} called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207
ModPerl::RegistryCooker::run('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x5620f98cc4a8)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 173
ModPerl::RegistryCooker::default_handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x5620f98cc4a8)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/Registry.pm line 32
ModPerl::Registry::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x5620f9dd1f08)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/mod_perl.pl line 139
Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x5620f9dd1f08)') called at (eval 2497) line 0
eval {...} called at (eval 2497) line 0

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Bug 1711607: Run CSI hostpath containers privileged during tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 10, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jsafrane: An error was encountered adding this pull request to the external tracker bugs for bug 1711607 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

JSONRPC error 100500: Insecure dependency in parameter 3 of DBI::db=HASH(0x5620fb6d2928)->do method call while running with -T switch at /loader/0x5620f51258a8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 327.
at /loader/0x5620f51258a8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 327.
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug::update_ext_info('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug=HASH(0x5620fa7a2da8)', 1) called at /loader/0x5620f51258a8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 121
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug::create('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug', 'HASH(0x5621008d13b0)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/extensions/ExternalBugs/Extension.pm line 858
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::bug_start_of_update('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs=HASH(0x5621000cb738)', 'HASH(0x5620f9da3090)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Hook.pm line 21
Bugzilla::Hook::process('bug_start_of_update', 'HASH(0x5620f9da3090)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm line 1170
Bugzilla::Bug::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x5620fe6b4530)') called at /loader/0x5620f51258a8/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/WebService.pm line 80
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::WebService::add_external_bug('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x5620fb09a8b8)') called at (eval 10421) line 1
eval ' $procedure->{code}->($self, @params)
;' called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 220
JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x5620ff5695f8)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 295
Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x5620ff5695f8)') called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 126
JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 70
Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/jsonrpc.cgi line 31
ModPerl::ROOT::Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::var_www_html_bugzilla_jsonrpc_2ecgi::handler('Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x5620fad4d1f0)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207
eval {...} called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207
ModPerl::RegistryCooker::run('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x5620fda03068)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 173
ModPerl::RegistryCooker::default_handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x5620fda03068)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/Registry.pm line 32
ModPerl::Registry::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x5620fad4d1f0)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/mod_perl.pl line 139
Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x5620fad4d1f0)') called at (eval 10421) line 0
eval {...} called at (eval 10421) line 0

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Bug 1711607: Run CSI hostpath containers privileged during tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 10, 2019
@jsafrane jsafrane force-pushed the hostpath-privileged branch 2 times, most recently from a21cf42 to e0984cf Compare December 11, 2019 10:07
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 11, 2019
@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold
debugging build issues

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 11, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 11, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 11, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 11, 2019
@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel
/retest

I'm not sure what was wrong with CI yesterday... Ready for review.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 12, 2019
@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@gnufied
Copy link
Member

gnufied commented Dec 16, 2019

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 16, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jsafrane: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1711607, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 10, 2020
@knobunc
Copy link
Contributor

knobunc commented Jan 10, 2020

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bertinatto, gnufied, jsafrane, knobunc

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 10, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

20 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 083ccb4 into openshift:master Jan 12, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jsafrane: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1711607 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1711607: Run CSI hostpath containers privileged during tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@gabemontero gabemontero Awaiting requested review from gabemontero

@tbielawa tbielawa Awaiting requested review from tbielawa

Assignees

@gnufied gnufied

@bertinatto bertinatto

@knobunc knobunc

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
7 participants
@jsafrane @openshift-ci-robot @gnufied @bertinatto @knobunc @openshift-bot @openshift-merge-robot