Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1792107: sccadmission plugin incorrectly reports "no SecurityContextConstraints found in xxx" #24408

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sanchezl
Copy link
Contributor

@sanchezl sanchezl commented Jan 16, 2020

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 16, 2020
@sanchezl
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 16, 2020
@sanchezl sanchezl changed the title sync scc lister cache before using ensure scc lister cache synced before using Jan 16, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Jan 16, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sanchezl
To complete the pull request process, please assign bparees
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @bparees in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

 pickup apiserver-library-go
@sanchezl
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 18, 2020
@sanchezl
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retitle Bug 1792107: sccadmission plugin incorrectly reports "no SecurityContextConstraints found in xxx"

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot changed the title ensure scc lister cache synced before using Bug 1792107: sccadmission plugin incorrectly reports "no SecurityContextConstraints found in xxx" Jan 18, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jan 18, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@sanchezl: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1792107, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1792107: sccadmission plugin incorrectly reports "no SecurityContextConstraints found in xxx"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sanchezl
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 20, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@sanchezl: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1792107, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sanchezl
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@sanchezl: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-cmd c7fe973 link /test e2e-cmd
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-upgrade c7fe973 link /test e2e-gcp-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@sanchezl
Copy link
Contributor Author

Picked up in #24419

@sanchezl sanchezl closed this Jan 21, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@sanchezl: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants