Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IR-137: Awaiting for operators rollout to complete #25497

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 11, 2020
Merged

IR-137: Awaiting for operators rollout to complete #25497

merged 1 commit into from Nov 11, 2020

Conversation

ricardomaraschini
Copy link
Contributor

@ricardomaraschini ricardomaraschini commented Sep 14, 2020

Changes on image config triggers other operators rollout, in order to
play nice with subsequent tests we have to wait until their rollout
process is finished.

For reference, this is an attempt to fix issues reported on #25475

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 14, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. and removed approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Sep 14, 2020
@ricardomaraschini
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @deads2k

Would you be kind and give a look at this one? It is an attempt to address issues reported on #25475. We might already have a utility function to check the operator statuses, but I could not locate it.

@dmage
Copy link
Member

dmage commented Sep 15, 2020

@deads2k these tests take 40 seconds to complete each, is it [Slow]?

@ricardomaraschini
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@ricardomaraschini ricardomaraschini changed the title WIP - IR-137: Awaiting for operators rollout to complete IR-137: Awaiting for operators rollout to complete Sep 15, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 15, 2020
@ricardomaraschini
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @dmage

@ricardomaraschini
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@dmage
Copy link
Member

dmage commented Sep 21, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 21, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 3, 2020
Changes on image config triggers other operators rollout, in order to
play nice with subsequent tests we have to wait until their rollout
process is finished.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Oct 7, 2020
@ricardomaraschini
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@ricardomaraschini
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@ricardomaraschini
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Oct 13 08:56:21.491: INFO: lookupDiskImageSources: gcloud error with [[]string{"instance-groups", "list-instances", "", "--format=get(instance)"}]; err:exit status 1

@ricardomaraschini
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@fabianvf
Copy link
Member

fabianvf commented Nov 3, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 3, 2020
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Nov 4, 2020

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, dmage, fabianvf, ricardomaraschini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 4, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

19 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@dmage
Copy link
Member

dmage commented Nov 5, 2020

/hold cancel
The job e2e-aws-serial is broken.

@dmage
Copy link
Member

dmage commented Nov 5, 2020

oops, I meant
/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 5, 2020
@dmage
Copy link
Member

dmage commented Nov 9, 2020

/retest

1 similar comment
@ricardomaraschini
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@dmage
Copy link
Member

dmage commented Nov 11, 2020

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 11, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 96cfd8c into openshift:master Nov 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants