BUILD-278: account for cgroup v2 swap file only having swap for its amount, while cgroup v1 has memory+swap for its amount #26399
Conversation
…e cgroup v1 has memory+swap for its amount
bparees
added
the
bugzilla/valid-bug
|
/lgtm |
|
/test e2e-gcp |
thanks @coreydaley e2e-gcp-builds passed, so we are just battling flakes @adambkaplan re: approval, depending on when you circle to this during post PTO catch up - thanks |
|
thanks @bparees re valid bz label |
|
/retest |
|
/skip |
|
/refresh |
|
/test e2e-gcp |
|
another intermittent flake cited in sippy with a bz ... posted the failling job info in bz /test e2e-gcp |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: adambkaplan, coreydaley, gabemontero The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
approved
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest |
|
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 |
|
/refresh |
|
@gabemontero: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/retest |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
2 similar comments
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
2 similar comments
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/test e2e-gcp-upgrade |
|
/retest |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
4 similar comments
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
2 similar comments
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
@gabemontero: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
For those at RH, see https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C02258G4S79/p1629139934121300 for the tl;dr between @nalind and myself
summary: the cgroup swap files mean different things (memory+swap in v1, just swap in v2) our our build quota tests needs to account for this
/assign @adambkaplan
or
/assign @coreydaley
whoever has the more immediate cycles. Feel free to unassign as needed.
shellcheck:
/assign @bparees
if you are still amenable to adding valid bz label so I can then test against this in openshift/builder#252
fingers crossed last iteration on this