Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-4.13] OCPBUGS-12700: update-etcd-scaling-test #27892

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #27788

/assign Elbehery

@Elbehery
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips

@Elbehery
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @tjungblu
/assign @hasbro17

@Elbehery
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @DennisPeriquet

@Elbehery
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@Elbehery: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a jira issue, add 'XYZ-NNN:' to the title of this pull request and request another refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Elbehery
Copy link
Contributor

/retitle [release-4.13] OCPBUGS-12700: update-etcd-scaling-test

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.13] update-etcd-scaling-test [release-4.13] OCPBUGS-12700: update-etcd-scaling-test Apr 25, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 25, 2023

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.13] OCPBUGS-12700: update-etcd-scaling-test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 25, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-12700, which is invalid:

  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-12700 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.14.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #27788

/assign Elbehery

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Elbehery
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@Elbehery: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-12700, which is invalid:

  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-12700 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.14.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Elbehery
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@Elbehery: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-12700, which is invalid:

  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-12700 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.14.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Elbehery
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@Elbehery: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-12700, which is invalid:

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Elbehery
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 25, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 26, 2023
@tjungblu
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@tjungblu
Copy link
Contributor

I think approval needs to be done through @hasbro17
Maybe worth updating the https://github.com/openshift/origin/blob/release-4.13/test/extended/etcd/OWNERS at some point for the etcd folder

@Elbehery
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

2 similar comments
@Elbehery
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@Elbehery
Copy link
Contributor

Elbehery commented May 3, 2023

/retest

@Elbehery
Copy link
Contributor

Elbehery commented May 3, 2023

@hasbro17 ptal a look here

I have ran the test against 4.13 cluster and it passes


1 pass, 0 skip (33m37s)

mustafa@mustafas-MacBook-Pro origin % oc get machines -o wide -n openshift-machine-api

NAME                                                PHASE     TYPE         REGION      ZONE         AGE    NODE                                         PROVIDERID                              STATE

ci-ln-56dql7b-76ef8-447ml-master-1                  Running   m6a.xlarge   us-east-2   us-east-2a   131m   ip-10-0-222-112.us-east-2.compute.internal   aws:///us-east-2a/i-0e461fa2d21e87774   running

ci-ln-56dql7b-76ef8-447ml-master-2                  Running   m6a.xlarge   us-east-2   us-east-2c   131m   ip-10-0-189-178.us-east-2.compute.internal   aws:///us-east-2c/i-0417c686c26919da8   running

ci-ln-56dql7b-76ef8-447ml-master-gvgjl-0            Running   m6a.xlarge   us-east-2   us-east-2c   55m    ip-10-0-185-220.us-east-2.compute.internal   aws:///us-east-2c/i-04d7b4cff30979fa2   running

ci-ln-56dql7b-76ef8-447ml-worker-us-east-2a-fsp7r   Running   m6a.xlarge   us-east-2   us-east-2a   128m   ip-10-0-254-99.us-east-2.compute.internal    aws:///us-east-2a/i-0b06867346b2f9f26   running

ci-ln-56dql7b-76ef8-447ml-worker-us-east-2c-w2zph   Running   m6a.xlarge   us-east-2   us-east-2c   128m   ip-10-0-161-234.us-east-2.compute.internal   aws:///us-east-2c/i-02b026fbf67b128a7   running

ci-ln-56dql7b-76ef8-447ml-worker-us-east-2c-wpgb6   Running   m6a.xlarge   us-east-2   us-east-2c   128m   ip-10-0-187-77.us-east-2.compute.internal    aws:///us-east-2c/i-0419bcd1f880b6077   running

mustafa@mustafas-MacBook-Pro origin %

 

@hasbro17
Copy link
Contributor

hasbro17 commented May 3, 2023

/approve
/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 3, 2023

@hasbro17: Can not set label backport-risk-assessed: Must be member in one of these teams: [openshift-staff-engineers]

In response to this:

/approve
/label backport-risk-assessed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 3, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: geliu2016, hasbro17, openshift-cherrypick-robot, tjungblu

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 3, 2023
@Elbehery
Copy link
Contributor

Elbehery commented May 3, 2023

@mfojtik @deads2k hello ✋🏽

can we please get these labels here backport-risk-assessed, cherry-pick-approved

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented May 8, 2023

@Elbehery you might want to ping them on slack, I know some of them are drowned in GH notifications.

@deads2k deads2k added cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. labels May 8, 2023
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented May 8, 2023

/staff-eng-approved
/hold

hold until after 4.13 GA.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 8, 2023
@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented May 19, 2023

We should be able to unhold this now that 4.13 is GA :)

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented May 23, 2023

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 23, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 893ae57 and 2 for PR HEAD 2af700f in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 23, 2023

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade 2af700f link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial 2af700f link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@Elbehery
Copy link
Contributor

verify ci fails on

INFO[2023-05-23T[16](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/27892/pull-ci-openshift-origin-release-4.13-verify/1661037437029191680#1:build-log.txt%3A16):13:39Z] Executing test verify                        
WARN[2023-05-23T16:13:39Z] Unable to create pod verify, may be temporary.  error=pods "verify" is forbidden: the string value of PreemptionPolicy (PreemptLowerPriority) must not be provided in pod spec; priority admission controller computed Never from the given PriorityClass name
WARN[2023-05-23T16:13:40Z] Unable to create pod verify, may be temporary.  error=pods "verify" is forbidden: the string value of PreemptionPolicy (PreemptLowerPriority) must not be provided in pod spec; priority admission controller computed Never from the given PriorityClass name
WARN[2023-05-23T16:13:42Z] Unable to create pod verify, may be temporary.  error=pods "verify" is forbidden: the string value of PreemptionPolicy (PreemptLowerPriority) must not be provided in pod spec; priority admission controller computed Never from the given PriorityClass name
WARN[2023-05-23T16:13:46Z] Unable to create pod verify, may be temporary.  error=pods "verify" is forbidden: the string value of PreemptionPolicy (PreemptLowerPriority) must not be provided in pod spec; priority admission controller computed Never from the given PriorityClass name
INFO[2023-05-23T16:13:49Z] Ran for [18](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/27892/pull-ci-openshift-origin-release-4.13-verify/1661037437029191680#1:build-log.txt%3A18)m23s                               
ERRO[[20](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/27892/pull-ci-openshift-origin-release-4.13-verify/1661037437029191680#1:build-log.txt%3A20)23-05-23T16:13:49Z] Some steps failed:                           
ERRO[2023-05-23T16:13:49Z] 
  * could not run steps: step verify failed: failed to create or restart test pod: unable to create pod: timed out waiting for the condition 
INFO[20[23](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/27892/pull-ci-openshift-origin-release-4.13-verify/1661037437029191680#1:build-log.txt%3A23)-05-23T16:13:49Z] Reporting job state 'failed' with reason 'executing_graph:step_failed:running_pod'

@Elbehery
Copy link
Contributor

ran make verify locally and it passes

/retest-required

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit e075c24 into openshift:release-4.13 May 24, 2023
24 of 26 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-12700 is in an unrecognized state (Closed) and will not be moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #27788

/assign Elbehery

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet