New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.14] OCPBUGS-22411: fix: increase upper bounds for samples operator #28356
[release-4.14] OCPBUGS-22411: fix: increase upper bounds for samples operator #28356
Conversation
Samples Operator added another watching triggerig the upper bound for SNO. The upper limit was calculated to 52 via curl command below, increasing to 27*2 to buffer the change. ``` curl -L https://search.ci.openshift.org/\?search\=.\*Operator.\*cluster-samples.\*produces+more+watch+requests+than+expected\&maxAge\=168h\&context\=1\&type\=junit\&name\=aws.\*single-node\&excludeName\=\&maxMatches\=5\&maxBytes\=20971520\&groupBy\=job | grep watchrequestcount= | cut -d= -f2 | cut -d, -f1 ``` Signed-off-by: ehila <ehila@redhat.com>
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-22358 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-22411. Will retitle bug to link to clone. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-22411, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/lgtm The test failures on this are not as common on master/4.15 periodics |
/retest |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
@neisw: Can not set label backport-risk-assessed: Must be member in one of these teams: [openshift-staff-engineers] In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/assign @bparees |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bparees, eggfoobar, openshift-cherrypick-robot The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest-required |
81a21f1
into
openshift:release-4.14
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-22411: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-22411 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #28353
/assign eggfoobar