Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resolving visual defect on Storage .page-header #7778

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 4, 2016
Merged

Resolving visual defect on Storage .page-header #7778

merged 1 commit into from Mar 4, 2016

Conversation

rhamilto
Copy link
Member

@rhamilto rhamilto commented Mar 3, 2016

Border below "Storage" wasn't bleeding to the edges because of missing .page-header-bleed-left on .page-header.

Before:

screen shot 2016-03-03 at 4 57 13 pm

After:

screen shot 2016-03-03 at 4 59 46 pm

@rhamilto
Copy link
Member Author

rhamilto commented Mar 3, 2016

@spadgett, review and merge, please?

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

spadgett commented Mar 3, 2016

[merge]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/merge_pull_requests_origin/5192/) (Image: devenv-rhel7_3608)

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin merge up to bf612c4

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[Test]ing while waiting on the merge queue

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin test up to bf612c4

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test FAILURE (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/1816/)

openshift-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2016
@openshift-bot openshift-bot merged commit 2270e14 into openshift:master Mar 4, 2016
@rhamilto rhamilto deleted the storage-page-header branch July 6, 2017 16:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants