[release-4.10] OCPBUGS-1938: Bump fedora-coreos-config submodule for ISO mount fix

[jlebon]

Colin Walters (1):
      live-generator: Use a loop to work around potential races with udev on el8

I.e. coreos/fedora-coreos-config#1986

[openshift-ci]

@jlebon: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.10] OCPBUGS-XXX: Bump fedora-coreos-config submodule for ISO mount fix

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jlebon: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-1938, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-1936 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), but it is New instead
• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-1937 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), but it is POST instead
• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-1936 to target a version in 4.11.0, 4.11.z, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Colin Walters (1):
     live-generator: Use a loop to work around potential races with udev on el8

I.e. coreos/fedora-coreos-config#1986

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@jlebon: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.10] OCPBUGS-1938: Bump fedora-coreos-config submodule for ISO mount fix

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[cgwalters]

/label backport-risk-assessed

[jlebon]

FWIW, I've tested this commit on top of 4.10 manually already (see coreos/fedora-coreos-config#1986 (comment)). So we shouldn't get any surprises in the pipeline.

[cgwalters]

From my PoV we should just bypass the official bug backport process for this; it's basically just overhead.

Crucially, only new nodes (or whole new clusters) will hit the new code, so risk of any wide fallout is really low.

[sdodson]

We'll get things merged in order, the backport process is meant not only to ensure testing but to provide assurances that someone who was delivered this fix in 4.10.z doesn't then go repeat the process in 4.11 and lack the fixes. I'll grease the wheels so that 4.11 PR merges, it only needs lgtm now. Once that merges I'll make sure this gets in too.

[mike-nguyen]

/backport-risk-assessed

[ashcrow]

This backport still needs a lgtm

[ashcrow]

/test build-test-qemu

[mike-nguyen]

/lgtm

[sdodson]

Failure seems legit, 8.4 lacking newest os-tree?

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jlebon, mike-nguyen

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [jlebon,mike-nguyen]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[cgwalters]

It's a bug in our CI configuration here openshift/release#32820
(Which note, is distinct from the ART build configuration, which is its own problem)

The actual failure is because coreos/coreos-assembler#3114 merged, otherwise we might not have noticed CI was using cosa main.

[sdodson]

/test build-test-qemu

[cgwalters]

OK fun, this is now hitting ye olde 9p issues coreos/coreos-assembler#1812

/retest

[openshift-ci-robot]

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD e1583c4 and 2 for PR HEAD 33b0976 in total

[mike-nguyen]

I built RHCOS with this PR with no issues. The kola and testiso test also passed.

[mike-nguyen]

/override ci/prow/build-test-qemu

[openshift-ci]

@mike-nguyen: Overrode contexts on behalf of mike-nguyen: ci/prow/build-test-qemu

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/build-test-qemu

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@jlebon: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jlebon: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/os#1025

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-1938 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Colin Walters (1):
     live-generator: Use a loop to work around potential races with udev on el8

I.e. coreos/fedora-coreos-config#1986

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.