New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-4762: [release-4.10] manifest: bump to openvswitch2.17 #1147
OCPBUGS-4762: [release-4.10] manifest: bump to openvswitch2.17 #1147
Conversation
We need to consolidate OVS streams and move off OVS 2.16. Bump host OS OVS to 2.17 which has a good track record the past 10 months in 4.11+.
@dcbw: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@dcbw: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@dcbw: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@dcbw: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-4762, which is valid. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This is already happening as part of us switching to 9.2 for 4.13, so I think we can close this? |
See https://issues.redhat.com/browse/COS-1926 for the latest, but specifically here Line 25 in 059bf42
(Incidentally...having openvswitch on the host has recently caused us a not-small amount of pain...moving it into a container would have significantly helped recent rhel9 work) |
Oh I see, you want to get this all the way back to 4.10? Then I guess it's indeed easiest to land in master now. Note though this should really be tested somewhat manually pre-merge directly in a modified 4.10 build I think. |
And now that I look sorry this is already directly against release-4.10... From your PoV is this tested? |
@dcbw: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
@dcbw I think they're just waiting on your confirmation that this has been tested in 4.10. |
@dcbw As Scott said, waiting on confirmation that you think this is ready and we'll merge it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: abhat, cgwalters, dcbw, flavio-fernandes The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@dcbw: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:
These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with Jira Issue OCPBUGS-4762 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
We need to consolidate OVS streams and move off OVS 2.16. Bump host OS OVS to 2.17 which has a good track record the past 10 months in 4.11+.