Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-3798: [4.12] Dockerfile: bump regular image to OVS 2.17.0-62 #1409

Merged

Conversation

dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

@dcbw dcbw commented Dec 1, 2022

#1387 was supposed to do this but due to some refactors/rebases, ended up only doing it for microshift.

Mainly to get:
"ovsdb/transaction.c: Refactor assess_weak_refs."
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=325800&state=%2A&archive=both

which fixes a memory leak in ovsdb-server.

4.12 cherry-pick of #1362

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 1, 2022

@dcbw: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Dockerfile: bump regular image to OVS 2.17.0-62

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from abhat and trozet December 1, 2022 12:40
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 1, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@tssurya tssurya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 1, 2022
@dcbw dcbw changed the title Dockerfile: bump regular image to OVS 2.17.0-62 OCPBUGS-3798: [4.12] Dockerfile: bump regular image to OVS 2.17.0-62 Dec 1, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@dcbw: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3798, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

#1387 was supposed to do this but due to some refactors/rebases, ended up only doing it for microshift.

Mainly to get:
"ovsdb/transaction.c: Refactor assess_weak_refs."
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=325800&state=%2A&archive=both

which fixes a memory leak in ovsdb-server.

4.12 cherry-pick of #1362

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 1, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 1, 2022

@dcbw: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

OCPBUGS-3798: [4.12] Dockerfile: bump regular image to OVS 2.17.0-62

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcbw commented Dec 1, 2022

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 1, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@dcbw: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3798, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.12.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.12.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3797 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3797 targets the "4.13.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.13.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @anuragthehatter

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcbw commented Dec 1, 2022

/test e2e-vsphere-windows

[images], [release:latest], e2e-vsphere-windows 
ERRO[2022-12-01T12:41:53Z] Timed out waiting for image pull secrets in the test namespace. 
INFO[2022-12-01T12:41:53Z] Ran for 2m9s                                 
ERRO[2022-12-01T12:41:53Z] Some steps failed:                           
ERRO[2022-12-01T12:41:53Z] 
  * could not initialize namespace: timed out waiting for image pull secrets 

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 707c0d4 and 2 for PR HEAD c9bc1dc in total

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcbw commented Dec 1, 2022

/retest-required

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcbw commented Dec 1, 2022

/test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

terraform aws install/setup failure

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcbw commented Dec 1, 2022

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

aws/terraform issues

level=error msg=Error: creating network Load Balancer: SubnetNotFound: InvalidSubnetID.NotFound
level=error msg=	status code: 400, request id: bc27422b-983f-45e1-82b2-f39f2e8272d2
level=error

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 1, 2022

@dcbw: Overrode contexts on behalf of dcbw: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

aws/terraform issues

level=error msg=Error: creating network Load Balancer: SubnetNotFound: InvalidSubnetID.NotFound
level=error msg=	status code: 400, request id: bc27422b-983f-45e1-82b2-f39f2e8272d2
level=error

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift#1387 was supposed to do
this but due to some refactors/rebases, ended up only doing it for
microshift.
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 1, 2022
@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcbw commented Dec 1, 2022

/override ci/prow/unit

This is an unrelated race that's being solved in another PR

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 1, 2022

@dcbw: Overrode contexts on behalf of dcbw: ci/prow/unit

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/unit

This is an unrelated race that's being solved in another PR

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor

tssurya commented Dec 1, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 1, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 1, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dcbw, tssurya

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD f3ca096 and 2 for PR HEAD 45f0139 in total

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcbw commented Dec 2, 2022

/test e2e-vsphere-windows

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 2, 2022

@dcbw: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn 45f0139 link false /test e2e-openstack-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-ovn-hybrid-step-registry 45f0139 link false /test e2e-ovn-hybrid-step-registry
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn 45f0139 link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn
ci/prow/unit 45f0139 link true /test unit
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift 45f0139 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 4565b74 into openshift:release-4.12 Dec 2, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@dcbw: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3798 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

#1387 was supposed to do this but due to some refactors/rebases, ended up only doing it for microshift.

Mainly to get:
"ovsdb/transaction.c: Refactor assess_weak_refs."
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=325800&state=%2A&archive=both

which fixes a memory leak in ovsdb-server.

4.12 cherry-pick of #1362

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants