-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-32990: Bump OVS #2144
[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-32990: Bump OVS #2144
Conversation
@JacobTanenbaum: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-32990, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ RUN yum install -y \ | |||
selinux-policy && \ | |||
yum clean all | |||
|
|||
ARG ovsver=2.17.0-62.el8fdp | |||
ARG ovnver=23.06.1-39.el8fdp | |||
ARG ovsver=2.17.0-148.el8fdp |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@igsilya : how about this one? is this version ok?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess, we posted at the same time. :) See my other comment in this PR.
In short, -154 is the latest released 2.17.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FWIW, OVN version is the latest in this PR, so it's fine.
@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ RUN yum install -y \ | |||
selinux-policy && \ | |||
yum clean all | |||
|
|||
ARG ovsver=2.17.0-62.el8fdp | |||
ARG ovnver=23.06.1-39.el8fdp | |||
ARG ovsver=2.17.0-148.el8fdp |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While -148 is the first version that contains CVE fixes, it might be better to update to the latest FDP release instead. That is 2.17.0-154.el8fdp
. There are no changes between 148 and 154 that would be important for the ovn-kubernetes container, but it might be better to stay in sync with FDP. What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The goal of this update is to unblock the ART team. I would push back on bringing ovs up to FDP because it will be out of sync as soon as FDP updates
/retitle [release-4.12] OCPBUGS-32990,OCPBUGS-28604: Bump OVN/OVS |
@JacobTanenbaum: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-32990, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28604, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/retest-required |
bumping to version openvswitch2.17-2.17.0-148.el8fdp brings in fixes for all of the following CVE-2022-4337 CVE-2022-4338 CVE-2023-1668 CVE-2023-3966 CVE-2023-5366
13d2b33
to
f07a574
Compare
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: JacobTanenbaum, jcaamano The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
/label qe-approved
Tests passed as well |
@JacobTanenbaum: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-32990, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28604, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@JacobTanenbaum: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-32990, which is invalid:
Comment This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28604, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@JacobTanenbaum: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-32990, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@JacobTanenbaum: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-32990, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@JacobTanenbaum: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-32990, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@JacobTanenbaum: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest-required |
90c6af7
into
openshift:release-4.12
@JacobTanenbaum: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-32990: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-32990 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build ose-ovn-kubernetes-base-container-v4.12.0-202405221636.p0.g90c6af7.assembly.stream.el8 for distgit ovn-kubernetes-base. |
Fix included in accepted release 4.12.0-0.nightly-2024-05-22-184107 |
Bumping ovn to 23.06.1-112.el8fdp brings in fixes for
CVE-2024-2182
Bumping ovs to 2.17.0-148.el8fdp brings in fixes for
CVE-2022-4337
CVE-2022-4338
CVE-2023-1668
CVE-2023-3966
CVE-2023-5366
- What this PR does and why is it needed
- Special notes for reviewers
- How to verify it
- Description for the changelog