Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1956980: [release-4.7] fix ForEachAddressSet() as it is not calling the callback functions #523

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 28, 2021

Conversation

squeed
Copy link
Contributor

@squeed squeed commented May 4, 2021

we have,
external_ids : {name=kube-system_v4}
external_ids : {name=default_v4}
external_ids : {name=default.access-web.egress.3_v4}
external_ids : {name=kube-public_v4}
external_ids : {name=ovn-kubernetes_v4}
external_ids : {name=default.access-web.ingress.0_v4}
external_ids : {name=kube-node-lease_v4}
external_ids : {name=default.access-mysql.ingress.0_v4}
external_ids : {name=default.access-web.egress.0_v4}

so, there is only one part of key=value in external_ids and this
results in ForEachAddressSet() not calling the iterator function.

Signed-off-by: Girish Moodalbail gmoodalbail@nvidia.com

- What this PR does and why is it needed

- Special notes for reviewers

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

we have,
external_ids        : {name=kube-system_v4}
external_ids        : {name=default_v4}
external_ids        : {name=default.access-web.egress.3_v4}
external_ids        : {name=kube-public_v4}
external_ids        : {name=ovn-kubernetes_v4}
external_ids        : {name=default.access-web.ingress.0_v4}
external_ids        : {name=kube-node-lease_v4}
external_ids        : {name=default.access-mysql.ingress.0_v4}
external_ids        : {name=default.access-web.egress.0_v4}

so, there is only one part of key=value in `external_ids` and this
results in ForEachAddressSet() not calling the iterator function.

Signed-off-by: Girish Moodalbail <gmoodalbail@nvidia.com>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@squeed: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1956980, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.7.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.z)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1947176 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1947176 targets the "4.8.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.8.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (anusaxen@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

Bug 1956980: [release-4.7] fix ForEachAddressSet() as it is not calling the callback functions

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 4, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 4, 2021
@dcbw
Copy link
Member

dcbw commented May 5, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. labels May 5, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@dcbw: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1956980, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.7.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1947176 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1947176 targets the "4.8.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.8.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (anusaxen@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dcbw
Copy link
Member

dcbw commented May 6, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 6, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dcbw, squeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@sdodson sdodson added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label May 27, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 1113085 into openshift:release-4.7 May 28, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 28, 2021

@squeed: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1956980 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1956980: [release-4.7] fix ForEachAddressSet() as it is not calling the callback functions

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants