OCPBUGS-24839: Updating ose-route-controller-manager-container image to be consistent with ART

[openshift-bot]

Updating ose-route-controller-manager-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.16
TLDR:
Product builds replace base and builder images as configured. This PR is to ensure
that CI builds use the same base images as the product builds.

Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. jira/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-route-controller-manager.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
  are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
  of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
  from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

• In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
  set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
  To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
• You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #forum-ocp-art coreos slack channel.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-24839, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
• bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jitendar-singh

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Updating ose-route-controller-manager-container image to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Product builds replace base and builder images as configured. This PR is to ensure
that CI builds use the same base images as the product builds.

Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. jira/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-route-controller-manager.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
  are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
  of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

• In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
  set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
  To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
• You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #forum-ocp-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD c5cc7a7 and 2 for PR HEAD b8be3f4 in total

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-24839, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jitendar-singh

In response to this:

Updating ose-route-controller-manager-container image to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Product builds replace base and builder images as configured. This PR is to ensure
that CI builds use the same base images as the product builds.

Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. jira/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-route-controller-manager.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
  are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
  of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

• In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
  set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
  To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
• You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #forum-ocp-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[Miciah]

ci/prow/security failed, and the CI job's podinfo.json shows that the "clonerefs" init container failed with exit code 2:

% curl -s 'https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_route-controller-manager/36/pull-ci-openshift-route-controller-manager-main-security/1734217290821406720/podinfo.json' | jq -r '.pod.status.initContainerStatuses[1].state.terminated|.message+(.exitCode|tostring)'
ot"}]},"severity":"info","time":"2023-12-11T14:23:22Z"}
{"command":"PWD=/  mkdir -p /home/prow/go/src/github.com/openshift/route-controller-manager","component":"clonerefs","file":"k8s.io/test-infra/prow/pod-utils/clone/clone.go:85","func":"k8s.io/test-infra/prow/pod-utils/clone.Run.func2","level":"info","msg":"Ran command","output":"","severity":"info","time":"2023-12-11T14:23:22Z"}
{"command":"PWD=/home/prow/go/src/github.com/openshift/route-controller-manager  git init","component":"clonerefs","file":"k8s.io/test-infra/prow/pod-utils/clone/clone.go:85","func":"k8s.io/test-infra/prow/pod-utils/clone.Run.func2","level":"info","msg":"Ran command","output":"hint: Using 'master' as the name for the initial branch. This default branch name\nhint: is subject to change. To configure the initial branch name to use in all\nhint: of your new repositories, which will suppress this warning, call:\nhint: \nhint: \tgit config --global init.defaultBranch \u003cname\u003e\nhint: \nhint: Names commonly chosen instead of 'master' are 'main', 'trunk' and\nhint: 'development'. The just-created branch can be renamed via this command:\nhint: \nhint: \tgit branch -m \u003cname\u003e\nInitialized empty Git repository in /home/prow/go/src/github.com/openshift/route-controller-manager/.git/\n","severity":"info","time":"2023-12-11T14:23:22Z"}
{"command":"PWD=/home/prow/go/src/github.com/openshift/route-controller-manager  git config user.name ci-robot","component":"clonerefs","file":"k8s.io/test-infra/prow/pod-utils/clone/clone.go:85","func":"k8s.io/test-infra/prow/pod-utils/clone.Run.func2","level":"info","msg":"Ran command","output":"","severity":"info","time":"2023-12-11T14:23:22Z"}
{"command":"PWD=/home/prow/go/src/github.com/openshift/route-controller-manager  git config user.email ci-robot@k8s.io","component":"clonerefs","file":"k8s.io/test-infra/prow/pod-utils/clone/clone.go:85","func":"k8s.io/test-infra/prow/pod-utils/clone.Run.func2","level":"info","msg":"Ran command","output":"","severity":"info","time":"2023-12-11T14:23:22Z"}
2
% 

According to the git-config documentation, exit code 2 indicates that "no section or name was provided". It isn't clear why the git config would return that exit code, or what else might be returning the exit code (though git config is the last command in the output). Let's see whether the failure is persistent.
/test security

[candita]

FAIL: TestCreateClusterCustomConfig (2301.68s)

/test e2e-hypershift

[candita]

/retest

[candita]

/assign

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/security	2893cec	link	false	/test security

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[candita]

Checking in with workloads team about whether CI Prow Security failure is okay to ignore. cc @ingvagabund

[candita]

Safe to ignore the security job for now.
/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: candita, openshift-bot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-24839: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/route-controller-manager#36

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-24839 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Updating ose-route-controller-manager-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.16
TLDR:
Product builds replace base and builder images as configured. This PR is to ensure
that CI builds use the same base images as the product builds.

Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. jira/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-route-controller-manager.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
  are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
  of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

• In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
  set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
  To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
• You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #forum-ocp-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-bot]

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build ose-route-controller-manager-container-v4.16.0-202401030151.p0.g02ed219.assembly.stream for distgit ose-route-controller-manager.
All builds following this will include this PR.

[openshift-merge-robot]

Fix included in accepted release 4.16.0-0.nightly-2024-01-09-085011