New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1782847: sdn: undo debug logging #84
Bug 1782847: sdn: undo debug logging #84
Conversation
It was added to track down the informer issue; we caught it. It causes logs to be way too large.
@squeed: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1782847, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh |
@squeed: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1782847, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
I want to backport this to 4.3.0 before it releases. Thus, this is pretty important. @juanluisvaladas can you review? |
/lgtm |
/lgtm |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: danwinship, juanluisvaladas, squeed The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@squeed: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1782847 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.3 |
/cherrypick release-4.3 |
@squeed: #84 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.2":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@squeed: new pull request created: #85 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@squeed: failed to push cherry-picked changes in GitHub: pushing failed, output: "To https://github.com/openshift-cherrypick-robot/sdn\n ! [rejected] cherry-pick-84-to-release-4.3 -> cherry-pick-84-to-release-4.3 (fetch first)\nerror: failed to push some refs to 'https://openshift-cherrypick-robot:CENSORED@github.com/openshift-cherrypick-robot/sdn'\nhint: Updates were rejected because the remote contains work that you do\nhint: not have locally. This is usually caused by another repository pushing\nhint: to the same ref. You may want to first integrate the remote changes\nhint: (e.g., 'git pull ...') before pushing again.\nhint: See the 'Note about fast-forwards' in 'git push --help' for details.\n", error: exit status 1 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
It was added to track down the informer issue; we caught it. It causes logs to be way too large.