-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-6635: [build] Fix k8s version reporting #1401
OCPBUGS-6635: [build] Fix k8s version reporting #1401
Conversation
@aravindhp: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-6635, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
/approve cancel |
@aravindhp: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-6635, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test build |
5fe489f
to
a0613a6
Compare
/test build |
From the kube-proxy.log
|
a0613a6
to
d5753f2
Compare
/test gcp-e2e-operator Not sure why the kubelet.log is empty in the platform-none-vsphere-e2e-operator test |
@aravindhp WRT the commit message, should
read:
? |
d5753f2
to
80bffa1
Compare
Sorry my bad. You are correct. |
@aravindhp: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-6635, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@aravindhp: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-6635, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@aravindhp: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-6635, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
80bffa1
to
f6ab93d
Compare
/test vsphere-e2e-operator |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
This approach seems best given it's basically what happens on the Linux side. We just have to remember to make the Dockerfile changes in gitlab midstream as well.
c8c0e48
to
60c4b4b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sebsoto The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/test aws-e2e-ccm-install
Known issue: OCPBUGS-887 |
/test aws-e2e-ccm-install
Known issue: OCPBUGS-4005 |
/test aws-e2e-upgrade Seeing WMCO subscribe fail:
We have seen this error before and hopefully it is transient. |
/test aws-e2e-upgrade |
/hold Revision 60c4b4b was retested 3 times: holding |
/test aws-e2e-upgrade Hit DaemonSet scaling issue again |
@aravindhp: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
@aravindhp: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-6635 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.12 |
@aravindhp: #1401 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.12":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
The openshift/kubernetes repo does not propagate all tags from upstream. Only the X.Y.0 tag is propagated. This causes the Windows kubelet and kube-proxy Z version to lag behind its Linux counterparts. The Linux build of kubelet and kube-proxy figures out the Z version at build time. To do something similar for Windows, we can leverage the hack/update_submodules.sh script which is always used to update the kubelet and kube-proxy submodules. To achieve this, the following changes are made:
Now the built binaries will have the correct version encoded in them.
Example version update commit: