Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-4.12] WINC-1033: Use latest WICD binary during upgrades #1594

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1573

/assign saifshaikh48

Removes the unused credentials parameter from the method that copies
over and ensures the WICD executable exists on an instance.
This commit ensures the WICD controller is not running before running WICD
cleanup. This is needed if there is a node config failure after the WICD
service is started -- it would continually try to restart services,
clashing with `cleanup` which is trying to stop and remove them.

It also makes it so that WMCO transfers over the WICD binary to the
instance before running WICD cleanup. This ensures that in an upgrade
scenario, the new version's WICD executable is used to cleanup.
This is important so that WICD imporvements and bug fixes present in the
new version are used during the upgrade flow.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 29, 2023

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: An error was encountered cloning bug for cherrypick for bug WINC-1033 on the Jira server at https://issues.redhat.com/. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. request failed. Please analyze the request body for more details. Status code: 400: {"errorMessages":["Number value expected as the Sprint id."],"errors":{}}

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1573

/assign saifshaikh48

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@saifshaikh48
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

until WMCO 7.1.0 is released

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 29, 2023
@sebsoto
Copy link
Contributor

sebsoto commented May 1, 2023

/approve

@sebsoto
Copy link
Contributor

sebsoto commented May 1, 2023

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 1, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 1, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, sebsoto

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 1, 2023
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 31, 2023
@mtnbikenc
Copy link
Member

/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 31, 2023
@alinaryan
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 25, 2023
@alinaryan
Copy link
Contributor

/test aws-e2e-upgrade

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 538754f and 2 for PR HEAD f2601d0 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 25, 2023

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 90a3dd8 into openshift:release-4.12 Aug 25, 2023
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants