Connection ID processing

Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from #20749)

doc/designs/quic-design/quic-connID-retire.md

@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+QUIC Route Requirements
+=======================
+
+* Two connection IDs -- one local, one remote
+
+MVP
+---
+
+MVP does most of one side of the CID management.  The major outstanding items
+for a complete implementation are:
+
+* possibly increase the number of CIDs we permit (from 2)
+* use more than the just latest CID for packet transmission
+  * round robin non-retired CIDs
+
+Non zero Length Connection ID
+-----------------------------
+
+MVP does not issue multiple connection CIDs, instead it uses a zero length CID.
+To achieve this, more work is required:
+
+* creation of new CIDs (coded but not used)
+* responding to new CIDs by returning new CIDs to peer match
+* managing the number of CIDs presented to our peer
+* limiting the number of CIDs issued & retired
+* retirement of CIDs that are no longer being used
+* ensuring only one retire connection ID frame is in flight
+
+Connection Migration
+--------------------
+
+* Supporting migration goes well beyond CID management.  The additions required
+  to the CID code should be undertaken when/if connection migration is
+  supported.  I.e. do this later in a just in time manner.
+
+Retiring Connection ID
+----------------------
+
+When a remote asks to retire a connection ID (RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID) we have to:
+
+* Send retirement acks for all retired CIDs
+* Immediately delete all CIDs and routes associated with these CIDs
+  * Retransmits use different route, so they are good.
+  * Out of order delivery will initiate retransmits
+* Should respond with a NEW_CONNECTION_ID frame if we are low on CIDs
+  * Not sure if it is mandatory to send a retirement.
+
+When a remote creates a new connection ID:
+
+* May respond with a new connection ID frame (it's a good idea)
+* It reads like the NEW_CONNECTION_ID frame can't be used to retire routes.
+  However, see above.  Suggest we accept either.
+
+When we want to retire one (or more) connection IDs we have to:
+
+* Flag the route(s) as retired
+* Send a retirement frame (RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID)
+* Delete the connection(s) once they are retired by our peer (either
+  NEW_CONNECTION_ID or RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID can do this)
+
+State
+-----
+
+* routes we've retired until they are acked as being retired (uint64_t max CID)
+* routes our peer has retired don't need tracking, we can remove immediately
+* retired routes where we've outstanding data to send will have that data
+  sent before the retirement acks are send.  If these fragments need to
+  be retransmitted, they'll be done so using a new CID on a new route.
+  This means, there is no requirement to wait for data to be flushed
+  before sending the retirement ack.