New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
x509: remove dead call to strlen() #16987
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The condition `userlen == -1` isn't possible because this is already checked on line 159 above and the subsequent strlen(3) call guarantees that it's value is positive.
paulidale
added
branch: master
Merge to master branch
approval: review pending
This pull request needs review by a committer
labels
Nov 8, 2021
InfoHunter
approved these changes
Nov 8, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like some copy-and-paste magic.
paulidale
added
approval: done
This pull request has the required number of approvals
and removed
approval: review pending
This pull request needs review by a committer
labels
Nov 8, 2021
t8m
added
the
triaged: cleanup
The issue/pr deals with cleanup of comments/docs not altering code significantly
label
Nov 8, 2021
openssl-machine
removed
the
approval: done
This pull request has the required number of approvals
label
Nov 9, 2021
This pull request is ready to merge |
openssl-machine
added
the
approval: ready to merge
The 24 hour grace period has passed, ready to merge
label
Nov 9, 2021
Merged, thanks for the review. |
openssl-machine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 9, 2021
The condition `userlen == -1` isn't possible because this is already checked on line 159 above and the subsequent strlen(3) call guarantees that it's value is positive. Reviewed-by: Paul Yang <kaishen.yy@antfin.com> (Merged from #16987)
t8m
pushed a commit
to t8m/openssl
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 2, 2022
The condition `userlen == -1` isn't possible because this is already checked on line 159 above and the subsequent strlen(3) call guarantees that it's value is positive. Reviewed-by: Paul Yang <kaishen.yy@antfin.com> (Merged from openssl#16987) (cherry picked from commit a18cdd2)
openssl-machine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 9, 2022
The condition `userlen == -1` isn't possible because this is already checked on line 159 above and the subsequent strlen(3) call guarantees that it's value is positive. Reviewed-by: Paul Yang <kaishen.yy@antfin.com> (Merged from #16987) (cherry picked from commit a18cdd2) Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
approval: ready to merge
The 24 hour grace period has passed, ready to merge
branch: master
Merge to master branch
triaged: cleanup
The issue/pr deals with cleanup of comments/docs not altering code significantly
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The condition
userlen == -1
isn't possible because this is already checkedon line 159 above and the subsequent strlen(3) call guarantees that it's value
is positive.