Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

s390x: Fix GCM setup #18862

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

juergenchrist
Copy link
Contributor

Rework of GCM code did not include s390x causing NULL pointer dereferences on
GCM operations other than AES-GCM on platforms that support kma. Fix this by
a proper setup of the function pointers.

Fixes: 92c9086 ("Use separate function to get GCM functions")

Signed-off-by: Juergen Christ jchrist@linux.ibm.com

Rework of GCM code did not include s390x causing NULL pointer dereferences on
GCM operations other than AES-GCM on platforms that support kma.  Fix this by
a proper setup of the function pointers.

Fixes: 92c9086 ("Use separate function to get GCM functions")

Signed-off-by: Juergen Christ <jchrist@linux.ibm.com>
@paulidale paulidale added branch: master Merge to master branch approval: review pending This pull request needs review by a committer triaged: bug The issue/pr is/fixes a bug labels Jul 25, 2022
@hlandau hlandau added approval: done This pull request has the required number of approvals and removed approval: review pending This pull request needs review by a committer labels Jul 25, 2022
@openssl-machine openssl-machine added approval: ready to merge The 24 hour grace period has passed, ready to merge and removed approval: done This pull request has the required number of approvals labels Jul 26, 2022
@openssl-machine
Copy link
Collaborator

This pull request is ready to merge

@hlandau
Copy link
Member

hlandau commented Jul 26, 2022

Merged to master. Thank you.

@hlandau hlandau closed this Jul 26, 2022
openssl-machine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2022
Rework of GCM code did not include s390x causing NULL pointer dereferences on
GCM operations other than AES-GCM on platforms that support kma.  Fix this by
a proper setup of the function pointers.

Fixes: 92c9086 ("Use separate function to get GCM functions")

Signed-off-by: Juergen Christ <jchrist@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from #18862)
sftcd pushed a commit to sftcd/openssl that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2022
Rework of GCM code did not include s390x causing NULL pointer dereferences on
GCM operations other than AES-GCM on platforms that support kma.  Fix this by
a proper setup of the function pointers.

Fixes: 92c9086 ("Use separate function to get GCM functions")

Signed-off-by: Juergen Christ <jchrist@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from openssl#18862)
t8m pushed a commit to t8m/openssl that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2022
Rework of GCM code did not include s390x causing NULL pointer dereferences on
GCM operations other than AES-GCM on platforms that support kma.  Fix this by
a proper setup of the function pointers.

Fixes: 92c9086 ("Use separate function to get GCM functions")

Signed-off-by: Juergen Christ <jchrist@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from openssl#18862)

(cherry picked from commit 48e35b9)
openssl-machine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2022
Rework of GCM code did not include s390x causing NULL pointer dereferences on
GCM operations other than AES-GCM on platforms that support kma.  Fix this by
a proper setup of the function pointers.

Fixes: 92c9086 ("Use separate function to get GCM functions")

Signed-off-by: Juergen Christ <jchrist@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from #18862)

(cherry picked from commit 48e35b9)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approval: ready to merge The 24 hour grace period has passed, ready to merge branch: master Merge to master branch triaged: bug The issue/pr is/fixes a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants