New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add BSD-armv4 target based on linux-armv4 #18910
Conversation
Thank you. You will need to sign a CLA: |
Again? I have already signed one for #17090 |
Perhaps a different e-mail address was used for this commit? |
That is the case. #17090 uses your FreeBSD email address. This PR is using an email address that wasn't mentioned in your original ICLA. Is your contribution here on behalf of your employer? If so you will additionally need to be listed in the Intel CCLA. If your contribution is personal can you update the author to match that given in your ICLA? |
No, that was a mistake. It wasn't related to my work. Updated. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume you are ok with being named as the nominated community member for this platform on the platform policy (as you already are for other platforms)? If so please can you raise a PR to add yourself?
As to backport to 3.0/1.1.1 they are both LTS releases, and our policy says "The addition of new platforms to LTS branches is acceptable so long as the required changes consist solely of additions to configuration.". So, the changes in Configurations/10-main.conf would be acceptable - but the changes in util/perl/OpenSSL/config.pm are technically code not configuration. A version of this PR that doesn't make those changes would be ok for 3.0/1.1.1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't there be an inherit_from
statement somewhere? e.g.
inherit_from => [ "BSD-generic64"],
Indeed there should, thanks for catching that. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reconfirm
This pull request is ready to merge |
I've applied a temporary hold to this until openssl/web#357 is merged. Once that's in, this one can go in too. |
Is this one ready, as openssl/web#357 has been merged? |
Merged to master branch. Thank you for your contribution. |
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from #18910)
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from openssl#18910)
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from openssl#18910) (cherry picked from commit a9389c0)
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from openssl#18910)
If possible, please also merge to 1.1.1 and 3.0.
Checklist