New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace the 'SSL' broken link in ciphers doc with one pointing to security levels explained #1898
Conversation
@@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ Set security level to 2 and display all ciphers consistent with level 2: | |||
|
|||
=head1 SEE ALSO | |||
|
|||
L<s_client(1)>, L<s_server(1)>, L<ssl(3)> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Section 3 is wrong, it's in section 7 (have a look in doc/man7
)
I think I would prefer if the section number was changed unless there's a strong reason to change the reference.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You'r right. Sorry for missing that. May I still propose to add the link to 'security levels' which I found very usefull ?
PR changed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In such a case, is it better to modify the PR title ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i don't think ciphers is the place for the security-levels link. it should be in man7/ssl.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, I am going to update the PR.
Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Btw, this inspired me to look into manual links, and boy is there more. See #1900
…eems not being referenced from elsewhere
…eems not being referenced from elsewhere Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from #1898)
e330f55 on master; 66bf3bc on 1.1.0 thanks! |
SSL_CTX_set_security_level() seems not being referenced from elsewhere and an example using SECLEVEL is provided just above the 'SEE ALSO' section