Fix incomplete check on CMS_SharedInfo_encode #20181
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
CMS_SharedInfo_encode() can also return a negative error value, but this is not checked in the current check, only the zero error return value is covered. A previous PR [1] fixed the other caller's check of CMS_SharedInfo_encode in this file, but it seems like this place was missed. Fix it by changing the check to <= 0. [1] openssl@a752fc4 CLA: trivial
t8m
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2023
t8m
added
branch: master
|
OK with CLA: trivial. |
hlandau
added
approval: done
openssl-machine
added
approval: ready to merge
|
This pull request is ready to merge |
|
Merged to master, 3.1, and 3.0 branches. Thank you for your contribution. |
openssl-machine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2023
CMS_SharedInfo_encode() can also return a negative error value, but this is not checked in the current check, only the zero error return value is covered. A previous PR [1] fixed the other caller's check of CMS_SharedInfo_encode in this file, but it seems like this place was missed. Fix it by changing the check to <= 0. [1] a752fc4 CLA: trivial Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from #20181) (cherry picked from commit ba06181)
openssl-machine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2023
CMS_SharedInfo_encode() can also return a negative error value, but this is not checked in the current check, only the zero error return value is covered. A previous PR [1] fixed the other caller's check of CMS_SharedInfo_encode in this file, but it seems like this place was missed. Fix it by changing the check to <= 0. [1] a752fc4 CLA: trivial Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from #20181)
openssl-machine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2023
CMS_SharedInfo_encode() can also return a negative error value, but this is not checked in the current check, only the zero error return value is covered. A previous PR [1] fixed the other caller's check of CMS_SharedInfo_encode in this file, but it seems like this place was missed. Fix it by changing the check to <= 0. [1] a752fc4 CLA: trivial Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from #20181) (cherry picked from commit ba06181)
|
Same thing as in #20250: |
|
Thanks for your report @botovq. Could you please create a new GitHub issue which links to your two comments? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
CMS_SharedInfo_encode() can also return a negative error value, but this is not checked in the current check, only the zero error return value is covered. A previous PR [1] fixed the other caller's check of CMS_SharedInfo_encode in this file, but it seems like this place was missed. Fix it by changing the check to <= 0.
[1] a752fc4
CLA: trivial
Please note that I found this using a static analysis tool I am developing at the moment. It could therefore be a false positive bug. I manually reviewed the case to be extra sure that it is a real bug.
Checklist