Fix typos found by codespell #21467
Closed
Fix typos found by codespell #21467
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
the
severity: fips change
paulidale
approved these changes
Jul 16, 2023
paulidale
added
branch: master
slontis
reviewed
Jul 17, 2023
hlandau
approved these changes
Jul 17, 2023
hlandau
removed
the
approval: review pending
paulidale
added
the
approval: done
t8m
added
the
triaged: cleanup
t8m
approved these changes
Jul 17, 2023
openssl-machine
added
approval: ready to merge
|
This pull request is ready to merge |
|
Merged, thanks for the documentation fixes. |
openssl-machine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2023
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org> (Merged from #21467)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
About
re-use→reuse:reuseis found in all dictionaries, and more importantly, it already occurs > 100 times in the repository, so this is more a question of consistency than correctness.Not sure about
implementor→implementer. Both seem acceptable, but most dictionaries suggestimplementeralone or as a first choice (Cambridge, Merriam-Webster) and the Google Books Ngram database suggests thatimplementeroutdistancedimplementoraround 2000, and curiously even more in American than British English:https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=implementer%2Cimplementor&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019
Checklist