Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

.travis.yml: make package pulls conditional. #2735

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

dot-asm
Copy link
Contributor

@dot-asm dot-asm commented Feb 24, 2017

This is 1.1.0-specific partial pick from #2292.

Copy link
Member

@levitte levitte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yup

@levitte
Copy link
Member

levitte commented Feb 24, 2017

Side note: The no-stdio made me think, do we have anything that tries out the applink stuff? Would it be worth looking into a test if not?

@levitte
Copy link
Member

levitte commented Feb 24, 2017

(noticed typo fixes, consider this a re-confirmation)

@dot-asm
Copy link
Contributor Author

dot-asm commented Feb 24, 2017

There was syntax error in .travis.yml, missing space[!] in line 102 (even though it said it's line 100 that is broken!). So you guys have to reconfirm. But at least let's wait if travis finds more problems. I mean at least it's doing progress now, but would it manage to complete?

@dot-asm
Copy link
Contributor Author

dot-asm commented Feb 24, 2017

The no-stdio made me think, do we have anything that tries out the applink stuff?

Applink stuff is designed in such way that it remains disengaged if everything is compiled with same compiler. In other words it's problematic to test. Well, as was discussed in #2404, VS2015 might use applink even if everything is compiled with same compiler, but test suite doesn't use calls that would require applink. Do you mean that one would write separate test for that?

@levitte
Copy link
Member

levitte commented Feb 24, 2017

Do you mean that one would write separate test for that?

Something like that, yes

@dot-asm
Copy link
Contributor Author

dot-asm commented Feb 24, 2017

Red cross is unrelated. It's from appveyor and because I've cancelled the build myself.

levitte pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2017
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from #2735)
levitte pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2017
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from #2735)
@dot-asm dot-asm closed this Feb 25, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants