New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Assorted fixes #436
Assorted fixes #436
Conversation
I've merged in the commit from #423 as well. |
Is this meant as master only? |
0 is a valid file descriptor. RT#4068
RT#4081
@levitte I fixed all the issues locally, but I can 't currently push to GitHub (again...). I'll do it later.
They are all pretty simple fixes, so backporting them shouldn't be difficult. I can open new PRs for 1.0.2 and 1.0.1 if needed. |
Backporting is usually the matter of a cherry pick and perhaps one or two small conflicts to resolve. However, I usually want to know the intent of a pull request, hence my question. |
Ah ok. While they are all pretty small issues, I think they'd be worth backporting to at least 1.0.2. I was also looking at the |
I also just pushed the fixes for your comments. |
There's also |
So I went ahead and removed I also have another patch that removes the remaining FIPS code (~500 lines) but I don't know if you want to get rid of that as well. |
Actually, the removal of |
Ok, I moved that commit to #448. |
+1 as it stands now |
+1 from me too. you want to commit/push? let me know if you want me to do it. (i agree master and 1.0.2) |
I'll do it... and if we're backporting to 1.0.2, there's no reason whatsoever not to backport to 1.0.1. |
Pushed on master, 1.0.2 and 1.0.1 |
Use EVP API in more places
Just a bunch of little fixes I've been accumulating.