Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve backwards compat with 1.0.2 for ECDHParameters (1.1.0) #6036

Conversation

mattcaswell
Copy link
Member

In 1.0.2 you could configure automatic ecdh params by using the
ECDHParameters config directive and setting it to the value
"+Automatic" or just "Automatic". This is no longer required in 1.1.0+
but we still recognise the "+Automatic" keyword for backwards compatibility.
However we did not recognise just "Automatic" without the leading "+" which
is equally valid. This commit fixes that omission.

Fixes #4113

This is the 1.1.0 version of #6035.

Checklist
  • documentation is added or updated
  • tests are added or updated

In 1.0.2 you could configure automatic ecdh params by using the
ECDHParameters config directive and setting it to the value
"+Automatic" or just "Automatic". This is no longer required in 1.1.0+
but we still recognise the "+Automatic" keyword for backwards compatibility.
However we did not recognise just "Automatic" without the leading "+" which
is equally valid. This commit fixes that omission.

Fixes openssl#4113
@richsalz richsalz added approval: done This pull request has the required number of approvals issue: feature request The issue was opened to request a feature labels Apr 20, 2018
levitte pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2018
In 1.0.2 you could configure automatic ecdh params by using the
ECDHParameters config directive and setting it to the value
"+Automatic" or just "Automatic". This is no longer required in 1.1.0+
but we still recognise the "+Automatic" keyword for backwards compatibility.
However we did not recognise just "Automatic" without the leading "+" which
is equally valid. This commit fixes that omission.

Fixes #4113

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from #6036)
@mattcaswell
Copy link
Member Author

Pushed. Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approval: done This pull request has the required number of approvals issue: feature request The issue was opened to request a feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants