New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Vote: Accept PR#18407 for backfit to 3.0 as a policy exception. #52
Comments
-0 from @mspncp ? |
Yes, it is possible to vote -0 0 or +0. This is abstention with inclination against or for vote. |
@tmshort please also note that I like your proposed change and consider it an improvement. I'm just inclined against backporting it because I think we should not lightheartedly undermine our own stable-release-updates policy, which we published only recently: But you are right, -0 was an indecisive vote. So instead of leaving the decision up to Kurt who hasn't voted yet, I changed my mind and vote explicitly against it: |
Vote: [-1] (corrected) |
Well, the vote still depends on @kroeckx's outstanding vote. Which proves that the ability to count properly is not a strict requirement for becoming a mathematician ;-) |
Voting -1 |
Although openssl/openssl#18407 adds exactly 0 new tests or test cases, so we are not really voting an exception for that part of the policy, rather because we are considering this a new feature (not in the library or binaries, but in the test suite). I plan to close the vote tomorrow (unless someone else does it sooner) in case there are changes of opinions. |
Kurt voted -1; the sum() is -1, so the vote does not pass. I will close #18407 since it has already been merged to master. |
I forgot to record this vote as closed, fixing it now:
|
The topic of this vote is: Accept PR#18407 for backfit to 3.0 as a policy exception.
The snippet below records the current votes as cast during the weekly OTC meeting (2022-05-31) during which the vote was called.
The vote is still open.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: