New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make running individual ssl-test easier #18407
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome!! Why didn't I think of this years ago??
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@tmshort Sorry, but it is necessary to adjust the doc file - tests are failing. |
Yup, I'll fixup the docs. |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Are we OK with adding this to 3.0? Formally it's a feature... |
It's for testing; it doesn't impact library functionality at all. I put the branch: 3.0 on there. |
Sorry, didn't spot the 3.0 label on this. I don't think this can go there. The stable release updates policy says:
https://www.openssl.org/policies/technical/stable-release-updates.html I'm still ok with master |
24 hours has passed since 'approval: done' was set, but as this PR has been updated in that time the label 'approval: ready to merge' is not being automatically set. Please review the updates and set the label manually. |
I'll wait 24 hours after @mattcaswell's approval. Although, one could argue that it's not new tests, nor new test cases. |
I'd like to have this feature added to 3.0, and can raise an OTC hold if necessary. |
I'd like to see this in 3.0 too. |
I'd suggest merging this to master anyway (there is no disagreement there), but then keeping this PR open with an OTC hold to specifically address the 3.0 question. |
|
Merged to master. |
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from #18407)
Question to OTC: |
OTC: vote in progress on backfit for 3.0 |
The vote did not pass. Since this has already been merged to master, I am closing this PR. |
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from openssl#18407) (cherry picked from commit eec204f)
Checklist