Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Railways (rails) in train depot are detected as error (wrongly) #6607

Closed
07pepa opened this issue Jul 2, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Railways (rails) in train depot are detected as error (wrongly) #6607

07pepa opened this issue Jul 2, 2019 · 4 comments
Labels
validation An issue with the validation or Q/A code

Comments

@07pepa
Copy link

07pepa commented Jul 2, 2019

There is bug.... it detects a problem if rail crosses building (and yes it is in 99% of times wrong) but when it is in depot there is litteraly a rail in building...

I suggest add depot class of building that require to contain certain type of communication inside of it..

subclasses would need to contain precise type of communication
(if it is car,train/airplane/ship depot a road/railway/waterway or road for airplanes)

There is no any valid workaround there is no tunnel, bridge or something... just rail, road or part of river inside of building... (except to ignore "issue" in map)

@BjornRasmussen
Copy link
Contributor

The solution is to set the rail underneath as "covered" .

@BjornRasmussen
Copy link
Contributor

This should probably made more obvious, though.

@quincylvania
Copy link
Collaborator

@07pepa A rail crossing a train depot is still ambiguous without more information. The rail could be on a bridge over the building or a tunnel under the building. If it goes through the building you can just connect the rail to the edge of the building, then add indoor=yes or covered=yes to the inside part.

I agree we should make this easier. We're tracking that general concept over at #5924.

@quincylvania quincylvania added the validation An issue with the validation or Q/A code label Jul 2, 2019
@07pepa
Copy link
Author

07pepa commented Jul 2, 2019

@07pepa understood and agreeing with @BjornRasmussen should be more obvious :) THX

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
validation An issue with the validation or Q/A code
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants