Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dev site has inconsistent data #2154

Closed
b-jazz opened this issue Feb 23, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Dev site has inconsistent data #2154

b-jazz opened this issue Feb 23, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@b-jazz
Copy link

b-jazz commented Feb 23, 2019

Repro:

  1. Visit https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/44.04193/-123.07140
  2. Query any of the objects (e.g. Hayward Field)
  3. Click on the "Hayward Field" link in the left rail (https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/way/660988929)
  4. Receive the error message, "Sorry, way #660988929 could not be found."

I expected to see the tags for that object appear along with the last comment and the list of nodes that make up the way.

@tomhughes
Copy link
Member

The dev sites have totally separate databases so yes, most things on the map won't be there. Only anything that people have added on the dev site will be present.

@gravitystorm
Copy link
Collaborator

To expand further on what @tomhughes said - the dev apis start from empty databases, and their databases are occasionally emptied again. But they dev apis still use the normal third-party services, such as tileservers, nominatim, overpass etc which are all using "production" data, not the data within the dev api databases. So anything that uses a third-party service (like the query tool) will return production data, not the data from the dev apis.

Resolving this would be a tremendous amount of work. For every dev api, we would need a full set of tileservers, geocoding, minutely replications feeds, overpass servers, routing servers etc etc if we wanted full consistency between the different parts of the system. It's not really worth the effort.

@woodpeck
Copy link
Contributor

To expand further on what @gravitystorm said - while it is not "worth the effort" for the people currently involved in running the system, it would certainly be nice to have. I have posted about that in 2016 ("I'm now looking for a small team of people who have the time and energy to plan and install such a sandbox together.") offering to make the necessary server(s) available, but haven't had any takers. The offer still stands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants