Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[mbedtls] stop checking configuration explicitly #2293

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 22, 2024

Conversation

LuDuda
Copy link
Member

@LuDuda LuDuda commented May 21, 2024

This commit removes configuration sanity check for MbedTLS versions higher or equal to 3.0.0.

This is a follow-up after openthread/openthread#10263 and needed to migrate to Mbed TLS 3.6.0.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 39.77%. Comparing base (2b41187) to head (90fd5fd).
Report is 662 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2293       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   55.77%   39.77%   -16.01%     
===========================================
  Files          87       88        +1     
  Lines        6890     9778     +2888     
  Branches        0      721      +721     
===========================================
+ Hits         3843     3889       +46     
- Misses       3047     5691     +2644     
- Partials        0      198      +198     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

This commit removes configuration sanity check for MbedTLS versions
higher or equal to 3.0.0.

Signed-off-by: Łukasz Duda <lukasz.duda@nordicsemi.no>
Copy link
Member

@jwhui jwhui left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! 👍🏼

@jwhui jwhui merged commit 611cc86 into openthread:main May 22, 2024
30 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants