Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[OpenTX2.1.x][Enhancement] Adding global logical switch #2409

Open
LapinFou opened this issue Jul 3, 2015 · 13 comments
Open

[OpenTX2.1.x][Enhancement] Adding global logical switch #2409

LapinFou opened this issue Jul 3, 2015 · 13 comments

Comments

@LapinFou
Copy link
Contributor

LapinFou commented Jul 3, 2015

Having some global functions is (once again ;-) ) a very very very nice feature.
It would be perfect to also have some global logical switches (ex: to setup a advanced throttle security switch combined with some global functions).

@projectkk2glider projectkk2glider added this to the OpenTX 2.2 milestone Jul 5, 2015
@projectkk2glider
Copy link
Member

Needs eeprom change, so it will have to wait until 2.2

@LapinFou
Copy link
Contributor Author

LapinFou commented Jul 5, 2015

OK.
Thanks!
:]

@GilDev
Copy link

GilDev commented Feb 26, 2018

Up for that. I have a special combination of logical switches and functions that allows me to read or reset my timers when holding a lever for different amounts of time. It would be great if I could configure it once for all my models instead of redoing everything each time.

@bsongis bsongis modified the milestones: OpenTX 2.2.X, OpenTX 2.3.x Jul 11, 2019
@RipperDrone
Copy link

I have a low battery warning feature implemented based on latched logical switches (voltage <x for y seconds --> battery warning), even refined it to two alarm levels (bat low, bat critical).

Now I have 50+ models defined on the Taranis X9D+, but the battery voltage alarm is identical throughout all of them. I would LOVE to be able to handle it with global functions / global logical switches so each model can reuse the same battery warning feature without having to code it on 50+ models separately, which is what I have to do now.

Any chance of adding the global logical switches feature into 2.4 maybe? :-)

@3djc
Copy link
Contributor

3djc commented Dec 23, 2019

logical switches are not the issue, sensors are defined per model

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 20, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jun 20, 2020
@GilDev
Copy link

GilDev commented Jun 20, 2020

Oh no! 🥺

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Jun 20, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Dec 18, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Dec 18, 2020
@LapinFou
Copy link
Contributor Author

I hope not!
😕

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Dec 18, 2020
@0815Creeper
Copy link

Um, there are not many features that are still missing in otx but this is definitly one of them...

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 16, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Apr 16, 2022
@0815Creeper
Copy link

No, still to relevant to be stale!

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Apr 16, 2022
@Kjblootens
Copy link

Can we define global logical switches, based only on radio-based inputs (e.g. sticks, switches and pots) that can be used within models as logical values.

So we would have GL01-GLXX which I can then use in my models to affect a standard radio configuration.

This would avoid re-creating such logical switching in each model. The GLXX vs LXX naming avoid confusion within models programming.

An example would be a set of 6 GL linked to the 6 positions of the 6Px using a~x and [-100,-60,-20,20,60,100], or a set combination of switches as a pre-arm condition.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants