Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix format roboflow for coco #1113

Merged

Conversation

sooahleex
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

  • Fix format of roboflow dataset with coco format.
  • For this case, we need to use roboflow_coco

How to test

Checklist

  • I have added unit tests to cover my changes.​
  • I have added integration tests to cover my changes.​
  • I have added the description of my changes into CHANGELOG.​
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly

License

  • I submit my code changes under the same MIT License that covers the project.
    Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.
  • I have updated the license header for each file (see an example below).
# Copyright (C) 2023 Intel Corporation
#
# SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT

@sooahleex sooahleex requested review from a team as code owners July 31, 2023 06:57
@sooahleex sooahleex requested review from vinnamkim and removed request for a team July 31, 2023 06:57
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 31, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +0.01% 🎉

Comparison is base (2015d4c) 79.97% compared to head (9e039eb) 79.98%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1113      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    79.97%   79.98%   +0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          258      258              
  Lines        29299    29299              
  Branches      5740     5740              
===========================================
+ Hits         23433    23436       +3     
+ Misses        4516     4515       -1     
+ Partials      1350     1348       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
macos-11_Python-3.8 79.08% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
ubuntu-20.04_Python-3.8 79.97% <ø> (ø)
windows-2019_Python-3.8 79.90% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@vinnamkim vinnamkim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@sooahleex sooahleex merged commit e5b085f into openvinotoolkit:develop Jul 31, 2023
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants