-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ONNX Unique op support #15076
ONNX Unique op support #15076
Conversation
test_case.add_expected_output<int64_t>(Shape{3}, {0, 1, 0}); | ||
test_case.add_expected_output<int64_t>(Shape{2}, {2, 1}); | ||
|
||
test_case.run(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we split this file somehow? I suppose adding more and more tests will result in a long compilation..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have plans to create an epic for ONNX FE refactor (like legacy namespaces, python requirements unification) so I can include it.
Details:
Tickets: