lexicographical soundfile names

[AlexLashield]

Thanks for this tool! It really benefits me a lot.
However, there is a little bit problem here when use a batch program to traverse the result set for STT I found that the file names of the results are not following lexicographical order.
I hope to revise slicer2.py
Change Line 182 to

soundfile.write(os.path.join(out, f'%s_%05d.wav' % (os.path.basename(args.audio).rsplit('.', maxsplit=1)[0], i)), chunk, sr)

[yqzhishen]

Yes, the segments are here sorted numerically instead of lexicographical order. But normally in Windows file explorer, the files can be sorted correctly.

I agree that following lexicongraphical order will bring convenience to many user programs to deal with the segments. However, the problem is how to decide the default length of a segment index. For example, if you use %05d, then what if there are over 100,000 segments (even if this seems to be impossible)? Or if we use dynamic lengths (for example, %02d for 11-100 segments, %03d for 101-1000 segments), will it bring new problems to user programs when matching name patterns? What is your opinion on this?