Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

in OpenCL formats find_best_workgroup() should start from 32 for GPU's #12

Closed
ghost opened this issue Apr 19, 2012 · 1 comment
Closed

in OpenCL formats find_best_workgroup() should start from 32 for GPU's #12

ghost opened this issue Apr 19, 2012 · 1 comment

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 19, 2012

if(device_type==CL_DEVICE_TYPE_GPU) my_work_group=32;
for (; (int) my_work_group <= (int) max_group_size;
@ghost ghost closed this as completed Apr 19, 2012
@magnumripper
Copy link
Member

Isn't 32 nvidia specific, and even specific to current GPUs (as opposed to possible future models)? Is there a particular reason for not using CL_KERNEL_PREFERRED_WORK_GROUP_SIZE_MULTIPLE? I do not know but I suspect the latter would currently return 32 for nvidia and 64 for AMD.

kholia added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 29, 2012
@kholia
Add support for cracking PKCS #12 files.
c17b235
kholia added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 29, 2012
@kholia @magnumripper
Add support for cracking PKCS #12 files.
c965023
@frank-dittrich frank-dittrich mentioned this issue Mar 29, 2015
Closed
This was referenced Apr 27, 2015
Closed
Closed
@frank-dittrich frank-dittrich mentioned this issue May 9, 2015
Closed
@denis0 denis0 mentioned this issue Oct 6, 2015
Closed
@tomtastic tomtastic mentioned this issue May 13, 2016
Closed
@kholia kholia mentioned this issue Jul 1, 2016
Merged
@retpoline retpoline mentioned this issue Dec 28, 2021
Closed
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@magnumripper