-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ipq40xx: use existing upstream node labels #15415
Conversation
Good cleanup. I see in some of these DTS declarations for the SoC global counter, but have not seen a driver in Linux or Openwrt. These do anything, or another downstream relic?
|
This counter exists in the SoC, but it never had a driver that would expose it so its mostly just for documentation purposes. |
@Ansuel Can you take a sanity check look? |
I wonder what would be the usage? |
No idea really |
Currently, a lot of boards are still not using the existing label to reference the watchdog node, so lets rectify this. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Currently, a lot of boards are still not using the existing label to reference the prng node, so lets rectify this. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Currently, a lot of boards are still not using the existing label to reference the crypto node, so lets rectify this. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
WPJ419 is still manually defining dma nodes(And even some labels), so lets convert it to use the existing upstream labels for DMA nodes. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
This device does not have NAND enabled at all and NAND is the only consumer of QPIC BAM DMA, so drop the node. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Some boards are still defininig UART nodes under soc instead of using the existing upstream labels to reference them so convert them. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Some boards are still defininig I2C nodes under soc instead of using the existing upstream labels to reference them so convert them. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Some boards are still defining MDIO nodes under soc instead of using the existing upstream labels to reference them so convert them. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
WPJ419 is still manually defining PCIe node, so lets convert it to use the existing upstream labels for PCIe node and while we are here use the -gpios suffix instead. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
WPJ419 is still manually defining pinctrl node, so lets convert it to use the existing upstream labels for pinctrl node. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
WPJ419 is still manually defining SPI node, so lets convert it to use the existing upstream labels for SPI node. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Thanks! Rebased on top of main and merged! |
Currently, a lot of boards are still not using the existing label to reference the watchdog node, so lets rectify this. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Currently, a lot of boards are still not using the existing label to reference the prng node, so lets rectify this. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Currently, a lot of boards are still not using the existing label to reference the crypto node, so lets rectify this. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
WPJ419 is still manually defining dma nodes(And even some labels), so lets convert it to use the existing upstream labels for DMA nodes. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
This device does not have NAND enabled at all and NAND is the only consumer of QPIC BAM DMA, so drop the node. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Some boards are still defininig UART nodes under soc instead of using the existing upstream labels to reference them so convert them. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Some boards are still defininig I2C nodes under soc instead of using the existing upstream labels to reference them so convert them. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Some boards are still defining MDIO nodes under soc instead of using the existing upstream labels to reference them so convert them. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
WPJ419 is still manually defining PCIe node, so lets convert it to use the existing upstream labels for PCIe node and while we are here use the -gpios suffix instead. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
WPJ419 is still manually defining pinctrl node, so lets convert it to use the existing upstream labels for pinctrl node. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
WPJ419 is still manually defining SPI node, so lets convert it to use the existing upstream labels for SPI node. Link: openwrt#15415 Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
There are a lot of boards in ipq40xx that still manually define nodes under
soc
node for things that upstream already has existing labels so this PR converts all of them and fixes some weird stuff found along the way.